From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34070: 27.0.50; icomplete-mode candidate cycling broken for C-x C-f Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:55:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83h8ebdy61.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0ozdwfz.fsf@gnu.org> <83a7k3dto5.fsf@gnu.org> <4dd122fb-61b5-4605-9290-bde726598907@default> <154c946e-28c9-4afa-865a-ac15d2e83bce@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1547740667 15604 195.159.176.226 (17 Jan 2019 15:57:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 34070@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 17 16:57:43 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gkA35-0003wp-1b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:57:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47218 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkA5C-0005N3-67 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:59:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46100) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkA1T-0002l8-JK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:56:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkA1S-0004vK-PT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:56:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35949) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkA1S-0004vB-Lk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gkA1S-0006TQ-KE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34070 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 34070-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34070.154774054724855 (code B ref 34070); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34070) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2019 15:55:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35229 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gkA1D-0006Sp-9B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:55:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f178.google.com ([209.85.160.178]:41596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gkA1A-0006SY-N0 for 34070@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:55:45 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f178.google.com with SMTP id l12so11789571qtf.8 for <34070@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 07:55:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wymLc5pKOhFC2ruiuAFXlOqnwKOtNEyk+EsqkBeCmMk=; b=SjZJxJdEqc7hT+cqyhoSVhMQ40WW/PAkn7duiV6DY/ZuyVRbfFPuZcWAIh1p1g45CL gC81UotCziP17EIoy/FWb3n2D8xlhHWsNUviFWc7y/MXT3G+6cyvm5E7DR7oAY5wVoCR WmU/M6TZXI8NRp0EAY8Aauc3NGFmCpIuCDfI7QC7AtGvFezD1wEJc1/GIQf1NAtpDxqd BsB0EPfjjjP9+ZMYC0nZJJZxguK6IGzR0lzOK2sdH8IHrRyHu307z5ZDWzIVcJGu1UrI oSAQmZgHh3pGbAfYKpmVC5F3buXLw/xviUCMr/YrG0rzlf+SKxawHiNkpXVZ8tGoVGWD Hi+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wymLc5pKOhFC2ruiuAFXlOqnwKOtNEyk+EsqkBeCmMk=; b=KBbNxSG+ECnrFnQ86eYfbkHg1rnVjHXtTQHgGx/DiPc8MSYk6iaq6DUvMhY42Mo5lz xDfYgbIylN6rRjD8tGPKazJZG2ewAv8f8bo9DeJ/ZRLQ872sLlYGtWNEvDJog1psM8CB zk1524rCKIEc6OF6YvTYBzNrHGEj0HZrjeEqkIBe13ph6Nx6HqvrW3qfjpiHOTDja9t1 HDYM+5XU5/gFv4e4UqfMinQXOlb9QRVP4Jd00aj83EMLG0s7rle0bXF1lQgikbol6epl 502OvauExAeYh2ORZdJW/iBEOLVwezVeXp2swk1Fo+g2Jcn6+dEKOAUrHe0FvhUnQDWc yOMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfG7n7eXf+yGmsyoSiNU3WMD+RNjkV+XgRIM4ROVJ+kdN8HXpZC LvkIh6x9Maw+A+xnBPnbg7NSEqj1EIyXBn50Pww= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4oWoCOW/TCogMtFg4lTruFXTXtjUgklFwazdmtKyUj2s0SFKQ47w1H9PeO0s8L/0tt6WWxuceHrqTuZILl4WU= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7611:: with SMTP id t17mr11582122qtq.345.1547740539071; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 07:55:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <154c946e-28c9-4afa-865a-ac15d2e83bce@default> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:154521 Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:46 PM Drew Adams wrote: > I think you're right that the intention of my patch was > just to respect `completion-ignored-extensions'. That was > the "new" behavior to be introduced, and not silently. Right. That was the "declared" new behaviour (for your definition of "new"). But there was some "undeclared", undiscussed new behaviour: that was my point. > (Note too that you are adding to this bug, which was > purportedly about broken cycling. Is this additional > change necessary to fix the cycling problem, or should > it be the subject of a new bug report?) Right. I put emphasis on this myself, so I don't have to "note" it. If you believe it should be the subject of a new bug, go ahead and create it. I don't think it's worth it. -- Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora