On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 8:21 PM Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:

Sorry for this late answer, you got stuck in a slow lane :-(

> Do you have any thoughts about the lazy loading of Flymake features used
> in the patch discussed in this thread (re-attached for convenience)?

Looks fine to me.
[ The amount of work needed for `flymake-log` is a bit disheartening, tho.
Not sure making it a macro is worth the trouble. ]

Yup, I wrote somewhere else that I think that part is a bit over-enginneered.

The idea was/is to have it add the locus of the log call to the log entry.

But I don't remember ever having used that functionality.

So go ahead and make it an (autoloaded) function if you think it's best.

João