On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 8:21 PM Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
wrote:

> Sorry for this late answer, you got stuck in a slow lane :-(
>
> > Do you have any thoughts about the lazy loading of Flymake features used
> > in the patch discussed in this thread (re-attached for convenience)?
>
> Looks fine to me.
> [ The amount of work needed for `flymake-log` is a bit disheartening, tho.
>   Not sure making it a macro is worth the trouble.  ]


Yup, I wrote somewhere else that I think that part is a bit
over-enginneered.
The idea was/is to have it add the locus of the log call to the log entry.
But I don't remember ever having used that functionality.

So go ahead and make it an (autoloaded) function if you think it's best.

João