From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 16:25:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn2modrm.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile6o2ov.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20827"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 08 17:40:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1plAfs-0005Es-Su for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 17:40:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1plAfT-0000dc-UF; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 11:39:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1plAfS-0000dD-CM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 11:39:54 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1plAfO-0002pJ-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 11:39:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1plAQ5-0006tS-Mc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 11:24:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 15:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168096741726464 (code B ref 62720); Sat, 08 Apr 2023 15:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2023 15:23:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59328 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1plAPg-0006sm-Us for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 11:23:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:44945) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1plAPf-0006sX-8e for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 11:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f46.google.com with SMTP id q23-20020a05683031b700b006a1370e214aso20377322ots.11 for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 08:23:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680967409; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=dN5588BvQ9omDMDL7Pxy4iZhn+GM5FrXYzkggDfOaIE=; b=L9/4WyhcxXLP1l9TC7w3X4ZnPuLlktI5E0P3Shr59KEgyjcTJItvnbju3BC+m1HCz8 PLhiRukE6nn5nXMg9xMGYVhuQApJlg8AXR4B42SyLVIvdaQDMTxikqKzyLD5vyg+u54p mT0LL8umsySJCRj5kFgiBkRZG9gGrnr97StGBRMx30xzDQXapQdbi9sV/Qo/Y9bdDlm3 CvQxNZDq8V/RZ2WMarRuXR8XdzU9Kwxd+0J7iFqcpbiHqDfvz8lJcrx8GNqrhS6WgJZK 4fbZNpcceKvBkl1wtVj/DTLLXmlPkRAR1vvIqhlrMBqXelgOQqK7xBRabq8cb47trwk+ 6cMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680967409; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dN5588BvQ9omDMDL7Pxy4iZhn+GM5FrXYzkggDfOaIE=; b=RE7Y2C53TlfJPC5i69yjd0IrttGddEDz68oWGq9OhO4nVmPwplKHY0D4kCmjY6HHL1 TE5D3rdDRpfuUE7WK4FYcODrD2pR1q7ZP0JA9medY5Dw6IaRZsaePOW5MVi8aOqJJYhC BkLA4SYIYwRVSCJBfboCMqSyJKDqFMBjFzpygMbjI0bzE1EREXccl3X5YtGXiRuGzBew B6PQaNU7qDOuPT7M3b5eTPgWdGf6P/bQAgXLkqKHl/hG1ADnv3jtBxwlZvV8DGUj+CLo qjaCyVj5yvdSY5A46IJPWUfqZQOYHgL/YYqk5c0pGP3CVJQs5eqIaeU9OvFPMbJu91Ce WlZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9er6XmQgHXf5fPfqbSBRCpWPoLh1iRgDzyWPn+DxV9MY3yl81D7 bt5GA5UuVRBz3384x8e0WZUrqgWBWIVZbFiwOQg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ay72VWQuWOe4QK/Kt2+8gwBDNt4V9J4A/jGZSmPZjUwtk+jvISmz0pEAW07702hvya6ulAUP1jDAKCmUp2bC4= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6f0d:0:b0:6a3:e0df:6868 with SMTP id n13-20020a9d6f0d000000b006a3e0df6868mr470759otq.4.1680967409697; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 08:23:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ile6o2ov.fsf@posteo.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259480 Archived-At: On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 3:42=E2=80=AFPM Philip Kaludercic wrote: > > Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora writes: > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 11:43=E2=80=AFAM Philip Kaludercic wrote: > >> > >> Stefan Monnier writes: > >> > >> >> It's not impossible to upgrade in Emacs 29, of course. The only wa= y I > >> >> know is to M-x package-list-packages, find Eglot 1.14 in the list, = mark > >> >> it with 'i' and confirm installation with 'x'. But it is very awkw= ard. > >> > > >> > Maybe we should add a `package-upgrade` command? > >> > >> Just for :core packages or how would this differ from package-update? > > > > Just a note that I forgot M-x package-update existed. I was > > hoping it wouldn't suffer the same bug as package-install, but > > alas it does. > > As package-update just defers to package-install, I don't find this > surprising. What you want is that package.el always treats a built-in > package as upgradable to a package from ELPA. It seems like this should > be possible by adjusting the interactive spec of package-install and > modifying package-compute-transaction or even package-built-in-p. Sounds good. Can you propose a patch so we have something to look at and test? Jo=C3=A3o