From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: hoppe Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21505: 24.4; Buffer order Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:23:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8337yd7hgn.fsf@gnu.org> <877fnppmk0.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4g55yat.fsf@gnu.org> <87zj0lo52a.fsf@gnu.org> <83twqtqene.fsf@gnu.org> <83si6dqdig.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fe5fa2e8df7051ff302c8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442503526 30056 80.91.229.3 (17 Sep 2015 15:25:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21505@debbugs.gnu.org, tsdh@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 17 17:25:17 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zcb3k-0003aA-E4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:25:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59342 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zcb3j-0004TQ-DK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zcb3b-0004On-8T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zcb3W-0007fs-W7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zcb3W-0007fl-T7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zcb3W-0008Te-HR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: hoppe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21505 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21505-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21505.144250346032528 (code B ref 21505); Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21505) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2015 15:24:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zcb2p-0008SZ-OS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:24:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:32847) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zcb2o-0008SS-DX for 21505@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:24:18 -0400 Original-Received: by iofh134 with SMTP id h134so25733030iof.0 for <21505@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:24:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=H0ffSutQojViB847aGlJ6wUejzsSFmZio3MzkbDUCZQ=; b=AnR/8pt8Mu/7SRQB7rit8+MxZxGQSl95K9gKSZ1zto0ANlIUtGGoBn4r1O2uw8830R t48r02megZxXyEkjpx/vD91J9+DPhf7clV9lyyfa1tIGoPqNUVZ2MpozyqDwJrsiWwQ9 aohMtUnfB1hxpTsEphoWpKqA0WJD/KFOTgXlwVZGe+d0WKufXw3FINkACDsOtiDBwmFi tGy0f/7b+w6ZATweS5WD8pfQEcQ2m7nN3p9MAR8nWFKSoG2M29pD7VNAEbGVQrI4/z9h aK4qJhJKYr0Q4uGdRhJefLAzwdqmBo5RICVn6GgNEcgBerqL79aGd6XVbEnqmwUem+q+ 83Hw== X-Received: by 10.107.26.138 with SMTP id a132mr7307581ioa.5.1442503457670; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.107.142.133 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:23:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83si6dqdig.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:106691 Archived-At: --001a113fe5fa2e8df7051ff302c8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 No, and this is why it's a little weird. On my computer when I create the files a,b,c and run > emacs a b c the prompt of C-x b gives: c b a *scratch* *Messages* with file c opened first. BUT, the order of NextBuffer goes [c->b->*Messages*->*scratch->a] On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: hoppe > > Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:59:41 -0400 > > Cc: Stefan Monnier , tsdh@gnu.org, > 21505@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > In response to the first question, I'd like this to be the "easy" > request, that > > this behavior is only for when emacs opens and not continuously during > the > > session. I agree, it does not need to be maintained during the session. > > > > Re: Tassilo Horn: I purposely showed my example with a wildcard since > emacs > > could be given any expansion from the shell. To me it, and for my usual > use > > case, it doesn't matter. I have a bunch of files I'd like to edit and I > often > > miss those that are past the messages and scratch buffer. Opening the > files in > > the order given from the command line seems very natural to me. > > > > So to be clear, given the command run on the shell: > > > > > emacs a c b > > > > The buffer order should be [a,c,b,*messages*,*scratch*]. Currently the > default > > behavior looks something like [b,c,*messages*,*scratch*, a]. > > So it's just an issue with the order in which buffers are presented in > the prompt of "C-x b"? > --001a113fe5fa2e8df7051ff302c8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No, and this is why it's a little weird. On my compute= r when I create the files a,b,c and run=C2=A0

> emacs= a b c=C2=A0

the prompt of C-x b gives:
=
c=C2=A0
b
a
*scratch*
*Messages*

with file c opened first. BUT, the or= der of NextBuffer goes [c->b->*Messages*->*scratch->a]

On Thu, Sep 17= , 2015 at 11:19 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> From: hoppe <travis.hoppe@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:59:41 -0400
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <mon= nier@iro.umontreal.ca>, tsdh@gnu.org= , 21505@debbugs.gnu.org >
> In response to the first question, I'd like this to be the "e= asy" request, that
> this behavior is only for when emacs opens and not continuously during= the
> session. I agree, it does not need to be maintained during the session= .
>
> Re: Tassilo Horn: I purposely showed my example with a wildcard since = emacs
> could be given any expansion from the shell. To me it, and for my usua= l use
> case, it doesn't matter. I have a bunch of files I'd like to e= dit and I often
> miss those that are past the messages and scratch buffer. Opening the = files in
> the order given from the command line seems very natural to me.
>
> So to be clear, given the command run on the shell:
>
> > emacs a c b
>
> The buffer order should be [a,c,b,*messages*,*scratch*]. Currently the= default
> behavior looks something like [b,c,*messages*,*scratch*, a].

So it's just an issue with the order in which buffers are presen= ted in
the prompt of "C-x b"?

--001a113fe5fa2e8df7051ff302c8--