From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthew Persico Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37390: 26.3; ediff-buffers appears to have a focus issue Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:37:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1ddaf25a-e1c8-4fd2-1350-6ca8e33f31cb@gmx.at> <68193418-d3e6-fca2-4b86-d6d117768584@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d0d2e90592afe7fc" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="34286"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37390@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 16 20:39:21 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vuC-0008jR-Vh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:39:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38696 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vuB-0008S5-Tj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vu0-0008R4-OM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vtu-00033f-RG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42216) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vtu-00033V-Mu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vtu-0001Yn-JR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Matthew Persico Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37390 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37390-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37390.15686590985923 (code B ref 37390); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37390) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2019 18:38:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51037 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vtB-0001XS-Ct for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:38:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vs1-f44.google.com ([209.85.217.44]:42375) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9vt9-0001XB-Gf for 37390@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vs1-f44.google.com with SMTP id m22so312786vsl.9 for <37390@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:38:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jgL+Zpacu9kLtE5HR2bW032Xu+xc94LTCHNXfJDJvHE=; b=P+ZSNyAUn6B4fQsqWke1qF2+TqG6SmXGRBqffpAzYuo/YBfFOCzSJE9YEXpoCV0IvY gQ5MBN3VxHBNphFPNOX9s+QITlyfBP2sG5P0m2lXOYL2MtKJohovbH/VVZl8kBCb5PUc 1HJp44LZbtrmjPa3yUueULa6yNErF9HY5CfgVdfIYYZkA7qYyYqXMGqndSRlVN04kXJz c6cM9g4zfHBCTtkFsxd0E+fNqPsgw9cEOwRLd1HRu1DzTJccH7mFEAqSCfNWemiculnz A3fYZI1tZI8ZgvzYH7ohorXxPm3fe1qgvIOqegdEw6hAlBdp2f84KvOCGi+M6HBGomEX g26A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jgL+Zpacu9kLtE5HR2bW032Xu+xc94LTCHNXfJDJvHE=; b=aUSVoPKkYLu864adkBwGjn2/88816qOR2ZE3K4gaHqQbGfP4OwV3xDs//BeHt+QtHN HCbFRf9TfPF0JGI+oHe+VMbfT/49jscwnloapsVudvmHmaFES09uqti5Ow7S2SYsNu0U XFi59e9J8PFmxg04cyiNqi1GH80zbYFYclE/RJBcqobvf6F/+aYN7IgfqPDpzjpT3tDJ 8j159d7t7T4drcJKaMcJQ0c5piXUfCPXQVqd1gUbF/QDfAIzGWrveMIIvV7t03VFQAzA oI0nf00Xo3R2MAGSdAmHzVLtRe7Zd5GWhbI716XIcPIhOnaSnAPin9tD7re5rBP8TbrV bLnA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW77JtzH7hnarQyl4omotlt0Ew71hCsIJxUAILKGHpfdZEEGh5L tKVBapKE1p/qu55nbcU2Ts1eyaYnIGiqXrzTBcL/qWDj X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzRr/OaXo7A7TJAE4MKIOeHyn6+Vw2FV2EmSFrJZB7I34MLNHTdnzrQ2p0HyB5+A/7bXuI6U6xTCjNOwZdV9j8= X-Received: by 2002:a67:dc86:: with SMTP id g6mr696064vsk.181.1568659089706; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:38:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166573 Archived-At: --000000000000d0d2e90592afe7fc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good grief: https://stackoverflow.com/a/1680998/1830614 For YEARS I've been using a separate frame for control. I'll just toggle that off. No issues with that in 26.2. I will try in 26.3. And now that I see it, why the heck would you want a separate frame? To have multiple diffs going at the same time? On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 12:46 PM Matthew Persico wrote: > Well... > > I went back to 26.2 and lo and behold, I have a focus issue. Musts be som= e > part of the env in my rebuilt VM. Sigh. Feel free to close this issue. If > anyone has any suggestions as to what to look for, I would be most > appreciative. > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 7:38 PM Matthew Persico > wrote: > >> I am testing at work with a totally dpkged environment with chef doing >> the maintenance. I turned off the chef stuff last week so that it wouldn= =E2=80=99t >> re-overwrite my 26.3 deb file. I=E2=80=99ll turn chef on, downgrade to 2= 6.2, turn >> off chef, test, install 26.3, test and report back. That should keep the >> environment consistent between the two emacs versions. I=E2=80=99ll als= o send >> along a list of all the debs and the yums. Yeah we configure our vms as >> redhat 7.3 or 4 or 5 ( I=E2=80=99ll look tomorrow) and then all the stuf= f we build >> is in dpkg (because we have to support Solaris and aix too); I would pre= fer >> not to identify my employer so please don=E2=80=99t ask. Or comment. :-) >> >> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 04:26 martin rudalics wrote: >> >>> > But I faintly recall that I changed something >>> > in this area a few years ago and that subsequently Stefan had proble= ms >>> > with his minibuffer in a separate frame setup. >>> >>> The change I mentioned there was for Bug#24500 and Stefan's complaint >>> is in Bug#24803. I doubt these are related to your switch from Emacs >>> 26.2 to 26.3. Did you, when you performed that switch, upgrade other >>> parts of your environment too? And if so, can you try once more with >>> Emacs 26.2? >>> >>> martin >>> >> -- >> Matthew O. Persico >> > > > -- > Matthew O. Persico > --=20 Matthew O. Persico --000000000000d0d2e90592afe7fc Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Good grief: =C2=A0https://stackoverflow.com/a/1680998/183061= 4

For YEARS I've been using a separate frame for control. I&= #39;ll just toggle that off. No issues with that in 26.2. I will try in 26.= 3. And now that I see it, why the heck would you want a separate frame? To = have multiple diffs going at the same time?

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019= at 12:46 PM Matthew Persico <matthew.persico@gmail.com> wrote:
Well... <insert Gilder Radner Never Mind gif here>
I went back to 26.2 and lo and behold, I have a focus issue. Musts be some= part of the env in my rebuilt VM. Sigh. Feel free to close this issue. If = anyone has any suggestions as to what to look for, I would be most apprecia= tive.=C2=A0

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 7:38 PM Matthew Persico <matthew.persico@gma= il.com> wrote:
I am= testing at work with a totally dpkged environment with chef doing the main= tenance. I turned off the chef stuff last week so that it wouldn=E2=80=99t = re-overwrite my 26.3 deb file. I=E2=80=99ll turn chef on, downgrade to 26.2= , turn off chef, test, install 26.3, test and report back. That should keep= the environment consistent between the two emacs versions.=C2=A0 I=E2=80= =99ll also send along a list of all the debs and the yums. Yeah we configur= e our vms as redhat 7.3 or 4 or 5 ( I=E2=80=99ll look tomorrow) and then al= l the stuff we build is in dpkg (because we have to support Solaris and aix= too); I would prefer not to identify my employer so please don=E2=80=99t a= sk. Or comment. :-)
--
Matthew O. Persico


--
Matthew O. Persico


--
Matthew O. Persico
--000000000000d0d2e90592afe7fc--