---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Luis Henriquez-Perez <luishenriquezperez@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: bug#21922: Fwd: Patch for fixing "straigh-quote" case
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com>



>> I did see your message.

Ok, take your time. I just wanted to make sure I sent this to the right
place.

>> I meant to say (looking-at-p "[[:space:]\n]*quote\\_>")

I changed "[[:space:]\n]" -> "[[:space:]]\n" because I think that's what
you meant.


I posted the result of these change at the bottom of this reply.

I'm new to contributing patches. Is there anything else I need to do to get
this
into emacs?

```elisp
(if (or
     (= (point) calculate-lisp-indent-last-sexp)

     (eq (char-after (1+ containing-sexp)) ?:)

     (eq (char-before containing-sexp) ?')

     (let ((quoted-p nil)
           (point nil)
           (positions (nreverse (butlast (elt state 9)))))
      (save-excursion
        (while (and positions (not quoted-p))
         (setq point (pop positions))
         (setq quoted-p
          (or (eq (char-before point) ?')
           (goto-char (1+ point))
           (looking-at-p "[[:space:]]\n*quote\\_>")))))
      quoted-p))
    ;; Containing sexp has nothing before this line
    ;; except the first element.  Indent under that element.
    nil
  ;; Skip the first element, find start of second (the first
  ;; argument of the function call) and indent under.
  (progn (forward-sexp 1)
   (parse-partial-sexp (point)
    calculate-lisp-indent-last-sexp
    0 t)))
```

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 7:59 PM Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> wrote:

> Luis Henriquez-Perez <luishenriquezperez@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I replied to your personal email instead of this thread. I thought maybe
> my
> > replies had not been seen (and also that this should be recorded in the
> > thread). So this is what I had said:
>
> I did you see your messages, just haven't had so much time for handling
> Emacs bugs recently.  I was going to forward it to the list before
> replying, so thanks for doing that.
>
> > question 1:
> > I get an `unknown posix character class` error when I try (looking-at-p
> > "[[:whitespace:]\n]*quote\_>").  Did you mean to use [[:space:]] instead?
> > Did you mean:  (looking-at-p "[[:space:]]*quote\\>")?
>
> I mixed things up a bit, I meant to say
>
>     (looking-at-p "[[:space:]\n]*quote\\_>")
>
> The "\n" is needed because it typically has comment-ender syntax instead
> of space syntax.  "\\>" matches end of word, "\\_>" is end of symbol.
>
> > question 2:
> > The reason I used explicit whitespace character is because matches for
> > character classes like [[:space:]] are dependent on the active syntax
> table
> > in the buffer (see this issue
> > <
> https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/40911/why-do-regexp-that-matches-text-in-buffer-does-not-necessarily-match-same-text
> >).
> > Not sure if this will be a problem though, what do you think?
>
> I think relying on the mode's syntax table makes sense, though it
> probably doesn't matter a whole lot either way.
>