From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=95=D0=B2=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=91=D0=BE=D0=B9=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B2?= via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63757: 29.0.91 order of package paths changed: random old versions of packages in load-path Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 19:52:10 +1000 Message-ID: References: <83y1l7gzqw.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilcb2p1l.fsf@posteo.net> <87sfb8g85v.fsf@posteo.net> <83a5xf7pi5.fsf@gnu.org> <831qir7isf.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn0j621b.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=95=D0=B2=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=91=D0=BE=D0=B9=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B2?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001c3e9205fd4abe2d" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27459"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, 63757@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 04 11:53:27 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q5kQR-0006yY-B2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 11:53:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q5kQ6-0005ro-2m; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 05:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q5kQ2-0005rM-PM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 05:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q5kQ2-0006Ur-Gq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 05:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q5kQ2-0006zP-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 05:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=95=D0=B2=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=91=D0=BE=D0=B9=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B2?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2023 09:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63757 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 63757-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63757.168587235426831 (code B ref 63757); Sun, 04 Jun 2023 09:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63757) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2023 09:52:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q5kPZ-0006yg-Hu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 05:52:34 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp57.i.mail.ru ([95.163.41.95]:52284) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q5kPW-0006yQ-1m for 63757@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 05:52:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=list.ru; s=mail4; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:From:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:To:Cc; bh=qStVtGYn4ZVqXzXMCIiGky1ZYVvmpF8m7+cpziIjvQQ=; t=1685872350;x=1685962350; b=mMu7K3QE/gkML6WeyNTKjD2He/zZygC+qKMO7ghkXvvt1xYmNAYZNKQ4vFwqkH2V9bBdKjxfGCoSQVjYj/+7BVSi+727S6JdIqoT/MVsUhEiZats9v/3bJKoYjMbutQfDJo4lqw8gaa4WOAb/h+p67p5845LEHuRWe4JuS1uXbkAE+rjP3dOYsCWqhCU+KeUTmSAIaccYWaCaPY9o9l7NiFeQHDAcrQqc77Ml6EB6tVBw5H6RP76p9ALZGBITdOOWuwuhv5660S+YlNDlXqo/25jVgcvb/qDwt5TmXmelW8/ujCEs1VeIcrRuUI4gbI6hMxbtXFKfAEq+GbitdbvDA==; Original-Received: by smtp57.i.mail.ru with esmtpa (envelope-from ) id 1q5kPP-001dvS-80 for 63757@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 12:52:23 +0300 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f7378a75c0so2610425e9.3 for <63757@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 02:52:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxtdmUeH0+qi2SBvwfu/biuvSaCoVUVFvGsdU6rwj7Od8a40EXq ltZEN41PUw7xHsbv1vswf9XHI5qiQRmaBqYR75Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6Agsjw0LCy9dVhh1tX+fwdsYu4PPpLoaoLgp2DSybfKrSLaZTC+dXqMzr0YkFCJyjLCvnxeMQbWvhHjpzcM6E= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:a388:b0:3f7:33c1:129b with SMTP id hn8-20020a05600ca38800b003f733c1129bmr1563745wmb.33.1685872342480; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 02:52:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83wn0j621b.fsf@gnu.org> X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Authentication-Results: smtp57.i.mail.ru; auth=pass smtp.auth=artscan@list.ru smtp.mailfrom=artscan@list.ru X-Mailru-Src: smtp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eAau8CL7WIMRKs4sN3D3tLDjz0dLbV79QFUyzQ2Ujvy7cMT6pYYqY16iZVKkSc3dCLJ7zSJH7+u4VD18S7Vl4ZUrpaVfd2+vE6kuoey4m4VkSEu530nj6fImhcD4MUrOEAnl0W826KZ9Q+tr5ycPtXkTV4k65bRjmOUUP8cvGozZ33TWg5HZplvhhXbhDGzqmQDTd6OAevLeAnq3Ra9uf7zvY2zzsIhlcp/Y7m53TZgf2aB4JOg4gkr2biojZIfw4O47JkJVZ7SC7w/6aw== X-Mailru-Sender: 4C235FE2E5D2D8908AAA14FF54AB1936E9A15CEF8245C4B68DBF1DB6ADC3A45DEF0017A7BE1B9352A3C36B4D8423ABA5C77752E0C033A69EC36ED9D1848BBC3A06988B367FA93C37B4A721A3011E896F X-Mras: Ok X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:262927 Archived-At: --0000000000001c3e9205fd4abe2d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > So you are saying that other people mostly delete old versions from > ~/.emacs.d/elpa/, and that's why this problem was not reported until > now, is that right? Right. > What are our recommendations, if any, for cleaning up old versions of > ELPA packages? I had old versions of packages mostly because I had problems with moving between emacs versions in the past. For example, I had to roll back some package versions along with emacs version downgrading (after unsuccessful upgrade). But now my config is stabilized and I just deleted old versions manually a few days ago. On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 6:53=E2=80=AFPM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: =D0=95=D0=B2=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=91=D0=BE=D0=B9=D0= =BA=D0=BE=D0=B2 > > Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 18:43:13 +1000 > > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, philipk@posteo.net, 63757@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > I wonder how come this issue never came up until now, in all the time > > > since commit fb87d500, 9 months ago? What are you, =D0=95=D0=B2=D0= =B3=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B9, do that > > > bumps into this issue, that other people don't do? Or does this > > > affect only very specific packages? > > > > I moved my everyday working emacs instance to 29.0.91 and got almost 2% > completely broken > > packages. > > I rarely delete really old versions from my ~/.emacs.d/elpa. > > If your package-user-dir is cleaned more often, you may not notice that > your loaded packages have > > slightly different old versions. > > This can affect any package if it has few versions. > > So you are saying that other people mostly delete old versions from > ~/.emacs.d/elpa/, and that's why this problem was not reported until > now, is that right? > > What are our recommendations, if any, for cleaning up old versions of > ELPA packages? > --=20 __________________________ =D0=A1 =D1=83=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BC, =D0=91=D0=BE=D0=B9=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B2 =D0=95=D0=B2=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8= =D0=B9 =D0=90=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BA=D1=81=D0=B5=D0=B5=D0=B2=D0=B8=D1=87 =D1=81=D0=BE=D1=82. 8-924-202-25-65 e-mail: artscan@list.ru --0000000000001c3e9205fd4abe2d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> So you are saying that other= people mostly delete old versions from
> ~/.emacs.d/elpa/, and that&= #39;s why this problem was not reported until
> now, is that right?
Right.

> What are our recommendations, if any= , for cleaning up old versions of
> ELPA packages?
I had old versi= ons of packages mostly because I had problems with moving between emacs ver= sions in the past.
For example, I had to roll back some package ve= rsions along with emacs version downgrading (after unsuccessful upgrade).
But now my config is stabilized and I just deleted old versions man= ually a few days ago.

On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 6:53=E2=80=AFPM Eli Zarets= kii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> From: =D0=95=D0=B2= =D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=91=D0=BE=D0=B9=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B2 <artscan@list.ru> > Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 18:43:13 +1000
> Cc: monn= ier@iro.umontreal.ca, philipk@posteo.net, 63757@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > I wonder how come this issue never came up until now, in all the = time
> > since commit fb87d500, 9 months ago?=C2=A0 What are you, =D0=95= =D0=B2=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B9, do that
> > bumps into this issue, that other people don't do?=C2=A0 Or d= oes this
> > affect only very specific packages?
>
> I moved my everyday working emacs instance to 29.0.91 and got almost 2= % completely broken
> packages.
> I rarely delete really old versions from my ~/.emacs.d/elpa.
> If your package-user-dir is cleaned more often, you may not notice tha= t your loaded packages have
> slightly different old versions.
> This can affect any package if it has few versions.

So you are saying that other people mostly delete old versions from
~/.emacs.d/elpa/, and that's why this problem was not reported until now, is that right?

What are our recommendations, if any, for cleaning up old versions of
ELPA packages?


--
__________________________

=D0=A1 =D1=83=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BC,
=D0=91=D0=BE=D0=B9=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B2 =D0=95=D0=B2=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8= =D0=B9 =D0=90=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BA=D1=81=D0=B5=D0=B5=D0=B2=D0=B8=D1=87
=D1=81=D0=BE=D1=82. 8-924-202-25-65
e-mail: artscan@list.r= u
--0000000000001c3e9205fd4abe2d--