From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Corwin Brust Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39448: 26.1; ERC connect wierdness Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 13:29:11 -0600 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e8f568059e158577" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="108082"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: 39448@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 20:30:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j0Vnx-000S2o-I1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 20:30:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44728 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j0Vnw-0004N9-Jt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:30:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j0Vno-0004Ml-0U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:30:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j0Vnm-0007WL-Gl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j0Vnm-0007VN-CN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:30:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j0Vnm-0004pu-8y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Corwin Brust Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 19:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39448 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39448-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39448.158119017018524 (code B ref 39448); Sat, 08 Feb 2020 19:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39448) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2020 19:29:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51845 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j0VnF-0004oi-Is for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:29:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com ([209.85.208.42]:38422) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j0VnD-0004oU-MJ for 39448@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:29:28 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id p23so3537614edr.5 for <39448@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 11:29:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=jtNtbuBHo1sQohht2llrqZpxq5dHBhjUKINPYKQQBcw=; b=SgleAs3Ni/FWkv7iLhKLqaS9j5MMRggsmF6Z2FvgonYDV/s8nFhoNmx8LsLWEhV08/ jcEqCOH3iCUNVscRWDuJo+3cOWtyJe1oddzWonF/ssbWks3RUHAgs4NG/FlWxC2JNL5E +omKTStzvFfZhGZzzqufiVisEIb9sGJtTQZgJNwDX/dRmI1q69SLH+TZHEJIppLCuZqp y8VnaPNl/JRhBiAf7o+qYhcktNM+Z7bZfFlENa6n+KOcSMvHJycoJltlrTUQHrJwXvmg jrAhh7hW7Yul4SxTagjNR+VOqRC52I0WvMACVMO92XQ1db4lNCMUwOghFtjEj8jYhiyY fsAg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVukiapLao0gygldQbod2eHShfuf+CTZWb+bFuhSUzx+l+BvsfX iy8C39iMGUXO/zAMv66WhIvzY07TLnI8LNwNzwCsidopEaU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyUfLnELgvYqmhNBXXgurQM9Q+lg7e1R1I0X9ed6kmKeG+9WMMz3jMXAW0Jcfd+8yb740TZQ8pNCT1Vashi4co= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:6d2:: with SMTP id n18mr4468412edy.100.1581190161690; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 11:29:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175806 Archived-At: --000000000000e8f568059e158577 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi again, On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 11:39 PM Corwin Brust wrote: > Greetings! I'm reporting at the request of Bandali > Adding detail, again at the request of Bandali. /d/emax64/bin/runemacs.exe -Q --eval '(setq erc-debug-irc-protocol > t)(raise-frame)' > [...] > 1. ERC appears to start, ERC: CLOSED shown in the mode-line, "Connecting > [...]" in the minibuffer. > > 2. It appears to just sit there > [... ] > *** ERC terminated: failed with code 10060 > [... etc ...] I found that my ISP, Comcast, has added a service they call "Protected Browsing" or "Safe Browsing" or "xFi Advanced Security" depending on whether you are the web portal, the documentation for the web portal, or at their marketing, etc. Here's a forum thread with details for turning this off: https://forums.xfinity.com/t5/Email-Web-Browsing/Unblock-all-websites/td-p/3292083 Looking at the web portal I could see that lots of requests to port 113 were getting blocked (many with alarming log commentary about "China" and "Australia" and other parts foreign. The horror). Once I completely disabled the Comcast security feature, whatever it's called, ERC connects without difficulty. I think this may still be a valid bug, however, as I was able to connect to Freenode (used for testing in all cases) from rcirc even while Comcast's anti-productivity software was active. I'm curious how the two different IRC implementations handle/depend on IDENT. I'll dig into this if I can and report with such clues or questions as I find. Regards, -- *Corwin* 612-217-1742 612-298-0615 (fax) 612-695-4276 (mobile) *corwin.brust (skype)corwin@bru.st * --000000000000e8f568059e158577 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi again,

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 11:39 PM Corwin B= rust <corwin@bru.st> wrote:
Greetings!=C2=A0 I'm reporting at the request of Bandali=


/d/emax64/bin/runemacs.exe -Q --eval '(setq erc-= debug-irc-protocol t)(raise-frame)'
[.= ..]
1. ERC appears to start, ERC: CLOSED shown in the mode-line, &qu= ot;Connecting
[...]" in the minibuffer.

2. It appears to jus= t sit there
[... ]
=C2=A0 *** ERC t= erminated: failed with code 10060
[... etc ...]

I found that my ISP, Comcast, has added a service= they call "Protected Browsing"=20 or "Safe Browsing"=20 or "xFi Advanced Security" depending on whether you are the web p= ortal, the documentation for the web portal, or at their marketing, etc.=C2= =A0=C2=A0

Here's a forum thread with deta= ils for turning this off:=C2=A0

Looking at the web portal I could see t= hat lots of requests to port 113 were getting blocked (many with alarming l= og commentary about "China" and "Australia" and other p= arts foreign.=C2=A0 The horror).=C2=A0=C2=A0

= Once I completely disabled the Comcast security feature, whatever it's = called, ERC connects without difficulty.=C2=A0

I think this may still be a valid bug, however, as I was able to connect = to Freenode (used for testing in all cases) from rcirc even while Comcast&#= 39;s anti-productivity software was active.=C2=A0 I'm curious how the t= wo different IRC implementations handle/depend on IDENT.=C2=A0 I'll dig= into this if I can and report with such clues or questions as I find.
<= /div>

Regards,
--
Corwin
612-217-1742
612-298-0615 = (fax)
612-695-4276 (mobile)
=
corwin.brust (skype)
--000000000000e8f568059e158577--