From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Aaron Jensen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28512: 26.0.60; undecorated frames on macOS 10.13 do not resize properly Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:00:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20170925163301.GB45550@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20171016100119.GA41757@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20171016204631.GA44072@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20171017085859.GA633@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20171018195034.GB8705@breton.holly.idiocy.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1508374890 21602 195.159.176.226 (19 Oct 2017 01:01:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 01:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 28512@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Third Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 19 03:01:23 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e4zCu-0002wT-Vu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 03:01:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47042 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e4zD0-0004O9-SP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:01:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e4zCs-0004Nl-Fr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:01:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e4zCo-0003SU-KH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:01:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40218) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e4zCo-0003SN-FJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e4zCn-0001hc-Vj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Aaron Jensen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 01:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28512 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28512-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28512.15083748576527 (code B ref 28512); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 01:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28512) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2017 01:00:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48899 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e4zCj-0001hD-EI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:00:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]:43389) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e4zCg-0001gz-H4 for 28512@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:00:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f176.google.com with SMTP id j58so12616280qtj.0 for <28512@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:00:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HAGQ2m1ES4r/RvAjxbh/HTVfOYf/4aVZ06OrD+s2vOI=; b=baFbjOqeNu/+kDvs5bmY3B3z55E+h+DfhEAvNxadDiLqU+ycp4M4SElLnCyVvMHJB2 /u49UfM57/TEsOINF7RBz3ayhguVfoeTBwAbg9Yltph1PllW06T/J0gTsE0O/8chWmqX jGpseiZkXDCJETd75kyo5k0sIxsuP84DmlHqWGrFAEesnblo2sQVqFgSdim9y6OHuzAu 5ssj2JHl5y0aSVHdjPIPQV95eoml6RAqJo+Y/7V3IwvgF3fCe+4GM/2AwKPROJtWoUFa wA5hvuNftEZ8gX+ynQetvLgjlPjNXvGKLuUCFowWh7URBYBOSguiiD+omYdjTAsXaOM7 /DFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HAGQ2m1ES4r/RvAjxbh/HTVfOYf/4aVZ06OrD+s2vOI=; b=lzAvgyhEIo/TEDg4FLJW81K1QMqfoXZYTFfMfZW7QDRe4Cks+oMDgH/vEXgIP3tVeV nCMGOHX2+z3jJOR0B0h8lzDQOYDAFXk2f7ZvPEA2AyPquSJaqD7QoBwbN/ryMHNcd+vc dMz8QGj9BOfX87wLEL3t2Ggtxx1qpRa+9g5/Z1U1S51qzBw8WQHkGAOQOz3r0afwgmax 2CrK+q5b4/E8EKdPyyVIkqgvtVA4rtS/JjpBhHdc0yU1ptspcQkbmdkT4zHMINnbXnna lmkcXsWPukTnDQlrhBhby7xmeiFt1p7GqT+nYfQYJ8Xvmskxiw5hf35GgoQAQm5Ngd0F 0/Mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUBRsfxMN9H/M5GhVoqFPYIkljPCdBNkI3oIDfa+Xs0lfee98wh 9dhEQK0nrLU+QBIdlCzvT+rsckFlPbRh6szR/S8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SZBbeLqsp6ICNDwIAnI26PbIMARxqiFKqeODG5w5O5zolbIZBGcT17qV825gausDez/0JS5njkT68mlzkf7J8= X-Received: by 10.200.23.36 with SMTP id w33mr6092077qtj.50.1508374848895; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:00:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171018195034.GB8705@breton.holly.idiocy.org> X-Mailer: Airmail (457) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138701 Archived-At: On October 18, 2017 at 12:50:38 PM, Alan Third (alan@idiocy.org(mailto:alan@idiocy.org)) wrote: > Hmm, I take it these are not part of Emacs? No, they=E2=80=99re 3rd party applications. I use them more or less as lightweight window managers. > The diagonal resizing > should work, we just don=E2=80=99t have diagonal arrows because the ones = macOS > uses are undocumented. I couldn=E2=80=99t get it to work on any corner if I remember correctly. > > If you=E2=80=99re up for coding it, I=E2=80=99d definitely be happy to = test out the > > recreate-the-frame option. > > I=E2=80=99d rather not, to be honest. The below option seems better where= it=E2=80=99s > supported, especially if borderless windows are deprecated. Yeah, I=E2=80=99m yet to corroborate the deprecation, but I hear you. It probably just boils down to undecorated windows not being useful for me in the case I was using them for before. The transparent title bar isn=E2=80=99t so bad=E2=80=94I have a large enough monitor and I=E2=80=99m = not going to throw a fit just to get rid of the titlebar :) That said, it is also too bad that this represents a behavioral regression for frames created after the first one as those worked fine. It was only the first that had the issue. Would it be a crazy thing to create borderless frames as resizable but remove that flag if they become borderless after creation? This actually has me wondering if it would be a =E2=80=9Creasonable=E2=80= =9D thing to simply open a new frame immediately on startup and close the original frame if I really wanted the borderless. Aaron