From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aaron Jensen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28512: 26.0.60; undecorated frames on macOS 10.13 do not resize properly Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:19:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20171016204631.GA44072@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20171017085859.GA633@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20171018195034.GB8705@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <871r7mr6az.fsf@idiocy.org> <87wnjwnz0n.fsf@idiocy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12745"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Alan Third , Aaron Jensen , 28512-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 23 19:20:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Shl-0003Bk-6Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 19:20:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42014 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Shj-0005nM-Ou for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:20:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52612) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Sh8-0005lR-8N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Sh7-0002q5-Uw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:20:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Sh7-0000SX-PM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:20:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Aaron Jensen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28512 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 28512-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D28512.16402835931747 (code D ref 28512); Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28512-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2021 18:19:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34904 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Sgz-0000S7-B4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:19:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:34784) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Sgx-0000Ro-Jp for 28512-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:19:51 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f45.google.com with SMTP id v13-20020a17090a088d00b001b0e3a74cf7so6704030pjc.1 for <28512-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:19:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+Gh/JjIvFESomMYHKszDzX85W65MPA7rK2ibvZWrWus=; b=W1t99zwmXwAbiR2VNtBPgTVRs0cRrfPaj5/IQrRkozF6HHjm9PFqn8dohmVQNvrrJ5 59vWDBOGshZLS13HwaLpC5go1rVkJ8GkoRD3md4kUVRKoqBvjcUvNNX3D+u/GIbcEEyo AgINhVIlW6suhRuh1zesuBwNV3QVKuB4ubSuLy34Z6Owhe7Xd3Ni1NkuC/eI1q1Tfkre yU9BMS+yAxn8kii+fdhXMKAH2YwahQOJc+KxT2p43vlJCcLXSXX+6RsUphBlSHh8ZZyC JlaMdYRHLDIOB5kob4WkSxgcBE0fG4wsu6uZhJqE6koy+yK4D42pF4PL2Ef8c9ZaZoKP hjUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=+Gh/JjIvFESomMYHKszDzX85W65MPA7rK2ibvZWrWus=; b=XClg6Lfr2IXhXBjny9tPfF22CY6iF4wD3TORNs4oB2fPP6zQjYVve/YNTvQU7iIRPS Mx2wSenrT1yOUqLsWhMvF1KAspSd3+eZENBzYGNgB2J804vCp3qFEWJa6wdXK4VdQzzV kSOb+3dcJ72TNwP1yM93Pr/1ZOqRsUmqsmZu6IUIy7zZOKQos1r8vRUJF4tshN2XvS9k yvy1fG0dTY5lmnWVJCrJPxr+1fiTsvoMZEou3DWEKl8UDyjRfvSDLTSgwVUDN+8vIuJc jVGCcVACwh7/2sOktxgHuxfrnCetslhNJmg2Tsk+uxsO6TKmi/PGqr6XVDv/IpOPXSfO 434w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Gm0dJPUAyUM+PpbSoPlb0ARdZakmxeILAzPQg/Z445UdVuI/K AkXTudkHEm8WyH4h0GumeQCzqzduijMAnNjUEWE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFG6xApHdov/yHVGhl6+onk8yCefqEx6v9362Wp2RohDi49YhOjGJNhUJvbaUROCA1Ah0IFtVV6nIeKp4lgF8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:685:: with SMTP id m5mr3958933pjz.59.1640283585617; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:19:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222995 Archived-At: On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 11:09 AM Alan Third wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:20:40AM -0500, Aaron Jensen wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 3:52 PM Alan Third wrote: > > > > > > Aaron Jensen writes: > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 7:17 AM Alan Third wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi Aaron, > > > >> > > > >> if you're still interested in this I've got a preliminary implementation > > > >> of the recreate-the-frame setup in the scratch/ns/refactor branch. > > > >> > > > >> I've not changed the flags to make borderless frames resizable, but it > > > >> should be a simple change. > > > > > > > > Thanks, I'm sticking with a title bar for now, but maybe I'll give it > > > > a shot some time. > > > > > > I've pushed this change now and will mark this as done. > > > > Thanks. I'm out of context on this change now, but it looks like now > > that this change has merged all undecorated frames have a shadow, > > which I guess is what macOS gives resizable frames. I don't know if I > > mind it yet, but is there a frame-parameter that would turn that off? > > Looks like we can set hasShadow to NO. Maybe we want to do that to > undecorated child frames, or something? That's probably reasonable. I like it for emacs-mini-frame, but having the shadows on company posframe is silly, so I'm fine not having it for anything. Aaron