I think the file name in itself doesn't matter too much. But should we also rename all symbols to have a matching prefix?

Sharing the osc- prefix is not as clean but I guess there's enough space in it for the two packages...

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022, 21:57 Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:

Matthias Meulien <orontee@gmail.com> writes:

> Sure. And I can do the renaming, but what would be a good name?
> What do you think of osc-sequences.el?

Would ansi-osc.el be totally misleading?