From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Hanchrow Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22120: Another backtrace Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:19:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83io425py0.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpsi443p.fsf@gnu.org> <83twnm43pl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01183f48e3a7c20526cb9a3d X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450030883 18138 80.91.229.3 (13 Dec 2015 18:21:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:21:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22120@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 13 19:21:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a8BGi-0001Gh-13 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 19:21:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56177 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8BGh-0006mY-C8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:21:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51455) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8BGc-0006mF-SI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:21:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8BGX-0006EP-Vg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:21:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8BGX-0006EL-St for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:21:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a8BGX-0002H6-Om for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eric Hanchrow Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22120 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22120-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22120.14500308108665 (code B ref 22120); Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22120) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2015 18:20:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50469 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a8BFh-0002Fh-WA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:20:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:38858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a8BFf-0002FT-Uh for 22120@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: by igbxm8 with SMTP id xm8so69794843igb.1 for <22120@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:20:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=qTzmwfTAcDG6opU+TD79Lh7bhE7UyIyMvZ5//YnsXw4=; b=DubzWHw1imu4gWdku37EanPSU8DhGkzBjjTwiQ46EeXwDrDCqCLNraaXSYuTtF1cy/ mfgTk6iXpRa/PYvfI68p/3s13MDo70DsveWwHK39uAX4ytwU5AKrnIifQm/tHN31J+Kv vso/LgSw7z6A7bPfe1xAm6WomFPUUavKX8N+Itg+BKrcN3RrJfvA0KTBreL30Xt3Atgc ZzLvkHS6SNBPp3j4NIhrxv5NomdMGiIzaezxx12UaPeVY7Z0ADIKsyMjjGilt1HMbjCS Em8ZybgkC3pspfHBzlSKytb62tHVOAL0f37WP6K6ufeHI7NZXr8MpSM80x1bP3gsM2Ht ACFA== X-Received: by 10.50.79.196 with SMTP id l4mr13659380igx.59.1450030802377; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:20:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83twnm43pl.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109946 Archived-At: --089e01183f48e3a7c20526cb9a3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I glanced through (info "(elisp) Undo") and didn't see any sort of warning. Should we add one? I can certainly stick something in there myself, but doubt it'd be quite correct. On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:13 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Eric Hanchrow > > Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:07:43 +0000 > > Cc: 22120@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > I'm surprised that it is possible to cause a segfault from lisp. Is that > an > > indication of a problem in the core C code, or is that just the way > things are? > > That's what you get for messing with undo-list. > --089e01183f48e3a7c20526cb9a3d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I glanced through=C2=A0(info "(elisp) Undo") and= didn't see any sort of warning.=C2=A0 Should we add one?=C2=A0 I can c= ertainly stick something in there myself, but doubt it'd be quite corre= ct.

On Sun, Dec 13, 20= 15 at 10:13 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.o= rg> wrote:
> From: Eric H= anchrow <er= ic.hanchrow@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:07:43 +0000
> Cc: 22120@d= ebbugs.gnu.org
>
> I'm surprised that it is possible to cause a segfault from lisp. I= s that an
> indication of a problem in the core C code, or is that just the way th= ings are?

That's what you get for messing with undo-list.
--089e01183f48e3a7c20526cb9a3d--