From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12801: 24.3.50; `scroll-conservatively' and `scroll-step' Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:36:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <837gq04sdr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352101023 23027 80.91.229.3 (5 Nov 2012 07:37:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12801@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 05 08:37:13 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHF9-0003pG-Nm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:37:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45529 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHF0-0000kV-Sb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHEx-0000kQ-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHEw-0006rl-PH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39385) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHEw-0006rh-Kq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHHu-0007QU-Ba for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12801 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12801-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12801.135210115528484 (code B ref 12801); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12801) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2012 07:39:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHH8-0007PL-2A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:39:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:45748) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHH5-0007PE-Te for 12801@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:39:12 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so5137766oag.3 for <12801@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 23:36:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=005jdMMh7kAUzQ+T8O9ev8OE9fg+GhRMjAN+E33EDZU=; b=fCpK9bQypj5rGnngcORXmcJiKkLmmK3L6e0NQKYSKjAH1kdfPa73KgJmruEtddiqnK 5wmT4u1VdWEvAVjcPbOcAlbABVo2i2OvSZ78u0kKi/wRox0eQtQhMm1nsroB+EhUkvuS TmmwSbJ0OOew8e+TreF738906NPr2u8GZFuORuRUfYn10WU5w0qPXTpCnQ8G9zUXmYmP ooJY+Eg6745BWkGdNboPmXoghTZKVoqhguFJSRomPQMexcMTLM44LO4JTsN6zb8I9p1+ GO4lkHpkzjfJpZcPvqc5o9uz5TTnat13Gj+11orECRwkdBYSWVtW+7zGdoJzxNBODyL+ baQg== Original-Received: by 10.60.0.166 with SMTP id 6mr7056692oef.6.1352100967386; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 23:36:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:36:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66468 Archived-At: >> If you set scroll-conservatively, scroll-step is ignored for the >> purposes of deciding how much to scroll when point is off the window. >> So the code works as intended. The documentation is not wrong, as it >> describes scroll-conservatively before scroll-step, and the >> description quite naturally should lead one to the above conclusion, >> because these two variables contradict each other. > > Obviously I disagree. I mean: I read the info node several times and I couldn't figure out the intended behavior you've just described when both variables are set. -- Dani Moncayo