From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15046: 24.3.50; Extra Line under minibuffer in Mac OSX fullscreen Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 15:52:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <458E3DA2-8906-443F-9394-7F3E24DDABC5@gmail.com> <83pptnrwnr.fsf@gnu.org> <83mworrokf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376056400 17448 80.91.229.3 (9 Aug 2013 13:53:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 13:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15046@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 09 15:53:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n83-0005Zg-Bt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 15:53:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51258 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n83-0008J9-30 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:53:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38111) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n7v-0008Ig-3d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:53:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n7m-00081Y-QC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:53:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54949) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n7m-00080u-Lx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n7m-0003uU-8N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15046.137605633014960 (code B ref 15046); Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2013 13:52:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49264 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n6w-0003tE-I1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:52:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:43231) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n6u-0003t0-Gh for 15046@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b13so3569141wgh.31 for <15046@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 06:52:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wqQCRQo3L5sBwjMOh7voI+0eJTbsHMfauXx3H2RoiEo=; b=msnuGIZ2/rvbtuSfnfFxUo5vth2EyTKo4pG/r0YjAbvyYBiVRfYQSyl38BZ1vmeK05 9pFdhp17/9ifjS1WxR53F6IkxDphOtVb5SDbxgFjkASOEgly4IEeDCVVIJj5iRDCRbb8 Am7PjNeeTYlSk1lF178QOKkH/6ZDaiJ5DplIq5wcqyGg0R4VYqZFF601iQUTRl1toXT0 wp0kzHz1C8VcOHm+ZzPjykejenCpWD1j4rvxvHK73vGU8uh5/AtI8RTDIpvLlUQUyX+2 hbkbR8VYm0FbYk/eEpIoFATtgqAiyiM62S6+37VDIJXBK+aWRUv/PgjyKyNXuzGTzhK5 TJtA== X-Received: by 10.194.84.205 with SMTP id b13mr6111907wjz.92.1376056322620; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 06:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.217.128.15 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 06:52:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:77160 Archived-At: >> The minibuffer/echo area window is just another window, so why would >> Emacs treat it specially? If other windows can have partially visible >> lines, why cannot the minibuffer window have them? > > IMO, it is much better to give the leftover space to the main > window(s) than to the mini-window. The main reason I can think of now > is that the main window(s) is (are) more likely to have more text > beyond its last wholly-visible line than the mini-window (which > usually will not need more than one line). And moreover: In the cases when the text in the mini-window spans to more than one line, Emacs should expand the height of the mini-window so that the whole text is visible (unless the number of lines is too high. In that case there is no choice but to scroll). IOW: I don't think it is appropriate for the mini-window to show only part of a line. The whole text should be visible if possible, resizing the mini-window when necessary. -- Dani Moncayo