From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:22:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <83sho429zr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485505462 7639 195.159.176.226 (27 Jan 2017 08:24:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 27 09:24:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1pK-0000tJ-33 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:24:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43665 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1pN-0007hO-P8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:24:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1pH-0007h5-KQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:24:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1pC-0000AQ-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:24:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1pC-0000AJ-Iz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1pC-0004T7-Dj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25542 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25542-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25542.148550538317104 (code B ref 25542); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 08:23:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46931 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1oF-0004Ro-Ef for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:34477) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1oD-0004R6-IJ for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id v186so158199435lfa.1 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:23:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wPU6ENunAAIhCOpNqbVMx3AuvesW6DbFjzbD8hSSgYc=; b=Vv/tA/brykbwh6+355Rfl6t0KTS24QTCGUI2H2fIH8IhhN7J1YggzI0+oRob3rdRHK fnsjVmH0kIEo+ciNKKUGtTuaqiNtR0Nh9l0ibktQ1X+wFrx68bwscEEkRoOjRd7o14el uZpMOxxkkEiMjsC8H7SV5MXRG4H/jLWS7S7eQdDit1Qhd3GnfiwMrczfwN6B/0vJGc/j ODuPLQIMfFbBm1+3i3FthS2vlRvPbSO6SA7tet/BD7io9ED/8jFU82udWsQVMQ6eOCdd usqDf5lWSZERD5EeseYgXArJ40Ec4W1ZAXm1CHeg5Fu12GzY3Tu0UrH4BgRuJifr2hFX 5jIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wPU6ENunAAIhCOpNqbVMx3AuvesW6DbFjzbD8hSSgYc=; b=Y3O4S5RbB2CdQp95VjbXl8dHhgSxgRSOzo0rNwFdD7+MvMO8Q/kUj5CjzfG9EDN4wU D48xG7Fu5mzakNWUyKKBpy4xmokDcQwHJ9qkT31onuu7c/RpEes5VHJfgGVGRjKMEgmH EGievSNewzCzYuuFb4xrXhfYPL5UB6Ga3456nxNA1RYr9OM70WNxMhxMZ89jujVj7JEk HrHWz4U61xq+PazPOiAL4AugOrA6poJLIzSdIxK4tMODToWOj3euRLuFwUG1vg2CZ14i I5z7FT99dwCpi97ZetQpKrDVCN/+Mw40jDLF7xJOibeXBwLm6/q2wpVmxqRIDPQl1FUK ywhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXItoaRV6api1xmlULDM678cdREbxEfOy6YNAA7gLKw/TPWlVHXUBFjUz3fJMUISkx7/g6n2xdEK8sOgTA== X-Received: by 10.46.83.19 with SMTP id h19mr2651258ljb.72.1485505375654; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:22:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:22:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83sho429zr.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128648 Archived-At: >> > (2) How do the frames from before step 2 and after step 3 differ? >> > Please use M-: (frame-geometry) and post the =E2=80=98outer-positi= on=E2=80=99 and >> > =E2=80=98outer-size=E2=80=99 values. >> >> The frames are exactly equal. Both in size and positon on the screen. > > This seems to contradict your original report, where you said the two > frames had different sizes. Mmmm I said this: Observed behavior: The frame is not maximized (it is smaller that a maximized one, both in height and width). So I don't see any contradiction - What I wanted to express in both cases is that the Emacs frame, after the final step, is _not_ maximized (as it should be). IOW: in step 3, the frame should have been switched from fullscreen to maximized, but it actually switched to the initial status/size (i.e. not maximized). HTH --=20 Dani Moncayo