From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: 9185@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:32:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH8Pv0hNc3KmaswgddpK8_utGVAADAKxy356-G6o7Xk9vL1DzQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3ei1aejzs.fsf@hase.home>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 13:13, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I understand what you say, but IMO, clearly the advantages of the
>> current behavior (save one extra M-p) in no way makes up for the
>> drawbacks (counter intuitive behavior; no way to check the tip of the
>> search ring before using it).
>
> You can still type C-s M-p M-n to get the first entry for inspection.
> It's a trade-off which is more important.
>
Indeed. (I realized it just after posting).
So what do people think it would be more convenient?
Isn't the requested behavior of M-p more intuitive?
Isn't it more consistent with the behavior of M-p in other contexts?
Isn't "M-p M-p" almost as quick to type than a single "M-p"?
...
--
Dani Moncayo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-28 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-28 8:12 bug#9185: 24.0.50; "C-s M-p" does not bring the tip of the search ring Dani Moncayo
2011-07-28 8:18 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-07-28 8:20 ` Deniz Dogan
2011-07-28 8:43 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-07-28 8:50 ` Deniz Dogan
2011-07-28 9:08 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-07-28 9:11 ` Deniz Dogan
2011-07-28 9:17 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-07-28 9:11 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-07-28 9:29 ` Juri Linkov
2011-07-28 9:50 ` Juri Linkov
2011-07-28 10:05 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-07-28 11:13 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-07-28 11:32 ` Dani Moncayo [this message]
2011-07-28 11:44 ` Juri Linkov
2011-07-30 8:52 ` Juri Linkov
2011-08-10 19:03 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-08-13 15:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-08-14 11:14 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-08-14 12:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-08-14 14:47 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-08-21 17:56 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-08-21 18:35 ` Juri Linkov
2011-08-21 19:24 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-08-22 11:06 ` Juri Linkov
2011-08-22 12:09 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-08-22 21:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-08-23 9:52 ` Juri Linkov
2011-08-23 18:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-08-24 9:41 ` Juri Linkov
2011-08-24 14:23 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-08-24 15:44 ` Juri Linkov
2011-08-24 16:18 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-08-24 18:28 ` Juri Linkov
2011-08-24 23:21 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-08-24 23:54 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-08-25 9:01 ` Juri Linkov
2011-08-25 10:10 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-11-19 19:59 ` Juri Linkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAH8Pv0hNc3KmaswgddpK8_utGVAADAKxy356-G6o7Xk9vL1DzQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmoncayo@gmail.com \
--cc=9185@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).