From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16340: 24.3.50; Maximize to the left/right side of the screen (on Windows 7 & 8) Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 23:16:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <52C935EB.9030109@gmx.at> <52CB0AF7.8010304@gmx.at> <52CB2822.1070503@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389046632 29776 80.91.229.3 (6 Jan 2014 22:17:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16340@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 06 23:17:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0IU1-0003Ud-MB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:17:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37897 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0IU1-0003Ee-6X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:17:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ITs-0003E1-J9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:17:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ITm-0005PD-H2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:17:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ITm-0005P9-DM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ITm-0005KO-4W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 22:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16340 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16340-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16340.138904658920425 (code B ref 16340); Mon, 06 Jan 2014 22:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16340) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2014 22:16:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39431 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ITF-0005JM-G3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:16:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]:48160) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W0ITD-0005JE-CV for 16340@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:16:27 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id ec20so10416932lab.1 for <16340@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:16:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lBbE8hO1EMF1gJ8Id9yOFMhENjB79rTyrcl50ae+REw=; b=ppHzXDQVGZmPTtLRxUetO1HDIK6BTdpL3X9SamVyuqOntKRzpjZ95imGUK4LEUFIBL rQ31jcUX3r7OkHbvdZev3IQd4yihwPdIUrzrkyfP/0zIcrQkk/j/GcrS7Ntl6qmDIEvI fwYaQByYIOlXfjjYOCaenEayStDPyrNg53CJS9PcywwvFqnPvaqYswS5ojlNdupMpfDk +R+OyPp/rXjheYXmXGeBZlkorBprLa1+Wfxg9hz0r4z+pmk4kEH9pNjN80Ry4unozg44 iTMI4Gpm+qhpIFe5PNt8FiURctHFAWHmmpEGkbFwFdBrzgr+6Hw+fUu/hcFlBDp4vs72 iA4w== X-Received: by 10.112.138.70 with SMTP id qo6mr2048641lbb.34.1389046586365; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:16:26 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.29.105 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:16:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52CB2822.1070503@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83073 Archived-At: > If you don't want the gaps, you have to set `frame-resize-pixelwise' to > true. That's what all other graphical programs on Windows do and that's > what I do. And that also means that dragging the border of an Emacs > frame will resize it pixelwise like the window of any other graphical > application. But with 'frame-resize-pixelwise' set to 'nil', a maximized Emacs frame takes up the whole "available" screen (except the taskbar), without letting any gaps anywhere. That's why I expected "maximize to left/right" to also take the whole left/right half of the available screen (without gaps). But I think that the key difference, which I didn't understand until now, may be that "maximize to left/right" (unlike the standard "maximize") aren't "states" of a window, i.e. the OS simply tries to resize and relocate the window to occupy the corresponding half of the screen. In that case, I understand the behavior I see, and I agree it is not a bug. I'll close this bug report then. Thanks for your time. -- Dani Moncayo