>>> No, if your function is called inside fontification-functions, you will >>> not have to monitor Emacs sources, your code will use a single tag, >>> namely 'fontification-functions. >> >> So, I will be able to unlock? > > Yes. Good. > > Wouldn't something like [...] not be much more robust? > > Definitely not. But why? If you allow to lift restrictions, why not make it easy to do? Call the variable/function that achieves this with a 100-character name, brand the programmer an idiot in the name or documentation - whatever. Don't advertise it in the manual, maybe add two lines somewhere in a dark corner, repeating that only morons would use it. But please, add something generic and simple to use. Logview needs to temporarily cancel restrictions in _practically all_ its function. In the branch I see code like this: narrow_to_region_locked (make_fixnum (get_narrowed_begv (w, PT)), make_fixnum (get_narrowed_zv (w, PT)), hook); ^^^^ So, suppose something in that hook (maybe even not installed by Logview itself, e.g. by a minor mode or by the user: it is common to have `add-hook' in Emacs initialization code) calls a function from Logview. Now, that function from Logview does (please-widen-i-cant-work-with-locked-narrowing ...) It, presumably, cannot know the tag used to install locked narrowing. Will it be able to temporarily lift _any and all_ locked narrowing or not? It probably won't freeze Emacs even if falling into an infinite loop, likely there are not so many non-bugs like the one in this thread, where misbehaving code can make Emacs hang irrepairably. But still, if restrictions are not lifted, Logview function will likely produce some incorrect result, require C-g to abort, or die with an error. Will the knowledge of the tag be required, as a sort of a "password", to lift narrowing restrictions, or not? Paul On Thu, 15 Sept 2022 at 22:44, Gregory Heytings wrote: > > >> No, if your function is called inside fontification-functions, you will > >> not have to monitor Emacs sources, your code will use a single tag, > >> namely 'fontification-functions. > > > > So, I will be able to unlock? > > > > Yes. > > > > > Let Logview behave against your recommendations. And then, when the > > users discover how crappy and unresponsive it is, as a result, compared > > to everything else, they will just uninstall the package and use > > something better. > > > > Given that you will be able to unlock, that will be possible. >