There are exactly the same length

In 2 tests it happened 2 times.  So probably is reproducible.


On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
wrote:

> > after-change-functions is a variable defined in `C source code'.
> > Its value is (jit-lock-after-change jedi:after-change-handler t)
> > Local in buffer test_unframed.py; global value is nil
>
> Hmm... could it be that jedi:after-change-handler does something funny?
> Tho it seems rather unlikely: when it gets run, the revert has
> already happened!
>
> > I have captured a corrupt buffer.  This time, emacs said 'file has
> changed,
> > reload?'.  Again it is corrupted.
> > The 1st diff is that in the corrupted file, the beginning of the file is
> > inserted into the middle of the buffer
>
> Normally revert compares the buffer's content and the file's content
> (from both ends) to find the common "prefix" and "suffix" and only
> performs the update on the characters in-between.  IOW the beginning of
> the buffer/file is not touched and the end is not touched either.
>
> So rather than "the beginning of the file is inserted into the middle of
> the buffer" it sounds like the "characters in-between" end up being
> inserted at the beginning of the buffer.
>
> Was the region active when the revert happened?
>
> Is the total size of the corrupted file correct? (i.e. the update was
> just not inserted at the right place)
>
> What can you say about the "splice points" (i.e. those positions in the
> file where the corruption happens: IIUC there's one at the very
> beginning, but where are the others (e.g. where is the "real
> beginning", in the corrupted file))?
>
> How frequently does it happen?  (i.e. would you be able to notice if it
> doesn't happen any more, after we disable some feature)
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Stefan Monnier <
> monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> > wrote:
>
> >> > I have seen (again this morning) I wind up with a corrupted buffer.
> >> > It appears a segment of the data is correct, but data has been
> >> > reordered.  I'm looking at a python source file.  For example, in the
> >> > middle of the buffer, it looks like the beginning of the file is
> >> > inserted (sorry I no longer have this buffer and can't be precise).
> >>
> >> Next time it happens, could you save the corrupted buffer to some temp
> >> file, and then compare that with the actual file's content, to get
> >> a more precise description of the corruption?
> >>
> >> You say it's a Python file.  What modes/packages do you use to edit
> >> those files?  What does `M-: after-change-functions' and `M-:
> >> before-change-functions' say in those buffers?
> >>
> >>
> >> Stefan
> >>
>
>
>
> > --
> > *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*
>



-- 
*Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*