bug#47775: First line length and GNU coding standards....

[Marco Antoniotti <marco.antoniotti@unimib.it>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1730 bytes --]

Hi

Many years ago we had 80 columns and that was a GOOD THING!

It is such a good thing that the GNU Coding Standards (and not only them),
unless I remember incorrectly, ask for 80 columns of code.

Also many years ago, and on this I may be wrong, it was also said that the

-*- Mode: ... -*-

line could appear within the first 10 (am I remembering right?) lines of a
file.

Now, in
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Library-Headers.html
it is said that the FIRST line of a elisp file must start like this:

;;; foo.el --- Support for the Foo programming language  -*-
lexical-binding: t; -*-

especially if you want lexical binding, which is NOT turned on if the
setting is NOT in the first line.

Now, this is not exactly a bug, but for many years (I am an old guy), I
wrote code with a separate header line containing only Emacs local buffer
customizations.  And the Lisp-Headers "suggestion" quickly runs afoul of
the 80 column coding standard.  Moreover, things like checkdoc (and
therefore flycheck) become a bit annoying if you do not follow suit.

Bottom line, this is just a bit of a rant, but I really like my (and, I
believe, many other old geezers') style of having something like

;;; -*- Mode: Emacs-Lisp; lexical-binding: t; some-var-with-a-long-name: t
-*-
;;; foo.el --- The foo pkg, which also happens to have description 79 col
long.

I know it's 2021, but I still like the 80 columns.

Anything that can be done about it?

All the best

Marco


-- 
Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professor         tel. +39 - 02 64 48 79 01
DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14 2043 http://dcb.disco.unimib.it
Viale Sarca 336
I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6528 bytes --]