> If this is to be accepted, why not extend it to all like mark functions, > listed below? Implementing them should be pretty similar, and you might > even be able to reuse the same helper for all these variants. Also, the > helper function might need to contain a double-dash in its name because > this is inherently a private function. This makes sense to me, although I have not found the same need for these to be marked. I'm happy to extend them as such; I'll add that in a later patch. > Please use `quote' to quote things in Emacs docstrings. Also, both here > and in other docstrings, the newline immediately after the first line, > while seems necessary, is usually redundant in Emacs docstrings. And > there is a typo: "amrk" -> "mark". > > I also think you shouldn't use wildcard-like elements in quotes (in your > case, you reuse part of the name in the quote), but I'm not sure. Done. Updated patch attached. On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 11:17 PM Ruijie Yu wrote: > > Zachary Kanfer writes: > > > Attached is a patch to add #'mark-sexp-forwards and > #'mark-sexp-backwards. These functions extend the region by sexps forward > and > > backward. They are mutually incremental: you can call mark-sexp-fowards, > then mark-sexp-backwards twice, then mark-sexp-forwards. After > > this, the region will consist of the two sexps before point and the two > sexps after point. > > If this is to be accepted, why not extend it to all like mark functions, > listed below? Implementing them should be pretty similar, and you might > even be able to reuse the same helper for all these variants. Also, the > helper function might need to contain a double-dash in its name because > this is inherently a private function. > > - `mark-defun' > - `mark-page' > - `mark-paragraph' > - `mark-word' > > > +(defun mark-sexp-helper (number-of-expressions) > > + "A helper function for 'mark-sexp-[forward, backward]'. > > + > > +If NUMBER-OF-EXPRESSIONS is positive, mark that many sexps forward; > > +otherwise, amrk backward." > > Please use `quote' to quote things in Emacs docstrings. Also, both here > and in other docstrings, the newline immediately after the first line, > while seems necessary, is usually redundant in Emacs docstrings. And > there is a typo: "amrk" -> "mark". > > I also think you shouldn't use wildcard-like elements in quotes (in your > case, you reuse part of the name in the quote), but I'm not sure. > > -- > Best, > > > RY >