Hello Eli, Thank you for your answers. Yes the bug can be closed. On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:47 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Umar Ahmad > > Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 02:14:06 +0530 > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 50284@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Anyway, I think you're right to point out that it was some lisp code > that was > > the culprit here. I've been running emacs continuously for the last 20 > days > > without a crash. This closely matches the time I upgraded all the > packages, so I > > think it's fair to assume that some package upgrade solved it. > > > > I was under the assumption that any lisp code crashing emacs would be a > bug in > > Emacs, but I guess we can keep this closed, considering that I can't > replicate > > it now. > > A Lisp bug shouldn't in general crash Emacs, but infinite recursion in > Lisp is an exception: it is not always possible to recover from that, > although Emacs does try. > > > > We need to know where in regex-emacs.c is the place shown in the last > line > > above. Can you try establishing that? > > > > I've no idea on how to establish that considering my rudimentary > knowledge of > > C. Do you mean, running emacs with GDB enabled and adding breakpoints to > figure > > this out? > > It is enough to run under GDB and produce a backtrace when the crash > happens. > > > > This indicates that you are using s.el, which makes tracking this bug > harder. > > > > Oh! I see. Didn't know this could make things harder. > > It is harder because to try anything we would need to install s.el. > > > > So I think we need to see the full Lisp backtrace when this happens, > or at > > least the Lisp code which runs. > > > > Got it. I only knew of `toggle-debug-on-error`, at the time of reporting > this > > bug, that would give me a trace if there were some errors in elisp but I > didn't > > know, how I could've managed to get the lisp trace when emacs crashes. I > just > > discovered the /etc/DEBUG file, after going through your mail, and it > seems the > > way to do this is again through GDB and running xbacktrace. Is this the > correct > > understanding or is there some other way to achieve this? > > Yes. In fact, if you start GDB from the src directory with Emacs > sources, the "backtrace" command will automatically run "xbacktrace" > as well, because we arrange for that in src/.gdbinit. > > So I guess we should close this bug for now? > -- Regards, Umar Ahmad