Thanks for all the feedback, I have a few queries.

> Thanks.  Please be sure to test the new faces with the following Emacs
> configurations:
>
>   . GUI frames with dark background
>   . GUI frames with light background
>   . TTY frames with dark and light backgrounds and with:
>     - 8 colors
>     - 16 colors
>

Do you know if there's an easy way I can test the faces on 8/16 colour
terminals?

>   (proced-run-status-code, proced-executable. proced-memory-default)
>   (proced-memory-mb, proced-pgrp): New faces.
>
Minor, but do you mean to add a closing paren at the end of each line?  I
saw this format in the commit log:
  (proced-run-status-code, proced-executable. proced-memory-default,
  proced-memory-mb, proced-pgrp): New faces.

This should probably be specified as percentage of total memory.  Or maybe
> there should be a separate defcustom for the percentage, and the condition
> should use both.  Just a single absolute threshold seems to cover only some
> reasons for highlighting processes with large memory footprint.
>

I was thinking highlighting based on percentage memory would be more suited
to the "mem" process attribute (granted though this is not implemented).
Though in hindsight a global threshold may not make sense if you're
connecting to remote systems with varying amounts of RAM.  Perhaps the two
thresholds could mark a percentage, say 10% and 50% of total memory?

I haven't tried your patch, but I'm curious whether it works also for
> proced buffers of remote systems.
>
Hi Michael, I did a quick check yesterday and it seemed to work as expected.

This should happen only for proced running on the local system.
>
Thanks, this should be fixed in the most recent patch.

I've attached a more up to date patch, with changes to faces (mainly adding
better defaults for light backgrounds), and a NEWS entry.  Also attached
are images showing the current colour schemes on light backgrounds and
terminals.

Thanks, Laurence