From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28736: 24.5; doc of `push' Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 08:41:01 -0700 Message-ID: References: <53afe0a4-8ce5-45fc-9e18-6bf52018c9b6@default>>> <83h8vatbtk.fsf@gnu.org>>> <09655ed0-be2c-4453-9755-224ec733e221@default>> <83wp45sgrm.fsf@gnu.org>> <9d23e7ad-ff25-4dac-b598-6614b272bebc@default> <83tvz9se2s.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23311"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 28736@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 25 17:42:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mU9ob-0005t0-5z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 17:42:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54698 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mU9oa-0006n8-2x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 11:42:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mU9oQ-0006hn-RC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 11:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51091) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mU9oQ-0003zs-Iu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 11:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mU9oQ-0006JP-3x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 11:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 15:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 28736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28736.163258447024145 (code B ref 28736); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 15:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2021 15:41:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mU9nZ-0006HL-Rp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 11:41:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:45671) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mU9nY-0006H1-CS for 28736@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 11:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id n2so8585815plk.12 for <28736@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 08:41:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EwepD2Iy2CRbFJD8i9gDUu3PXEq1Ue0h2YUpw9nnkkc=; b=XxR++8G0POZ0a+2fa/5dx1C7Zk8XnNs3ebK3qbn04msKqkZoZzkrJMyoZR9hRzZE0l dikPYgoR1qSaWl64Nu3jmk5mCHprIRS6gVztKFiwZ3xSLQQDYpcz/CGFpx1Iv8JIoINH pKZdG0eo6rxz7PJeRsT3jaFZm413RSR4ImHc0nUyHDETKhSj0mdl2zF7gbAmReWg17f8 6704kFZfMWesCWmudpskgoEVAyfTfNFxXo2qfsKmcTtAFp0xshjsdQBjPYhQlV1zJ2zx wgZkumWli1cRDrQF2cuihYygFSB9A0iu0liRl1Cbp0EeclODgK/HHkFf7yko331iqdZ9 C9Gg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532j1+YNq2+tdSOKEmf7Lp5yYMlLIZe36cQ+qUbfN7AGM27Y2eVs 3jNItQFFbwkPhje7GxZ5X/NiCmT5xn1d854BD0U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw++FzlrjQWFbnH9ISrO4IWl8pbgomkhTe9oGwzGk7/1OOEYZmQnTUsSzVwJxT/qrgr/i5pFETKsRd8AMXVVUs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3805:: with SMTP id mq5mr8895755pjb.143.1632584462381; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 08:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 08:41:01 -0700 In-Reply-To: <83tvz9se2s.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 08 Oct 2017 21:13:15 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215454 Archived-At: tags 28736 wontfix notabug close 28736 thanks Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 10:48:32 -0700 (PDT) >> From: Drew Adams >> Cc: 28736@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> > > The right question is why is it a problem to document this? >> > >> > Because we don't want to guarantee the return value won't >> > change in the future? >> >> Are you sure? > > No. The question here is if the return value of `push' should be documented. I took a look at Common Lisp, and they do not document its return value.[1] I think it's fine for us to also not document it, unless someone can show a clear reason why it should be. I'm therefore closing this bug report. Footnotes: [1] http://clhs.lisp.se/Body/m_push.htm