From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14358: Option to use GraphicsMagick instead of ImageMagick Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 09:37:23 -0700 Message-ID: References: <0n609nqjnw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20140"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 14358@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 30 18:38:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mgrN0-00053G-WA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 18:38:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51492 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mgrMz-0003c2-Gz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 12:38:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51648) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mgrMo-0003al-Iz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 12:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46771) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mgrMo-0008CM-Ab for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 12:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgrMo-0007d6-3b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 12:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14358 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 14358-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14358.163561185729261 (code B ref 14358); Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14358) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2021 16:37:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58309 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgrMN-0007br-RP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 12:37:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com ([209.85.215.181]:36516) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mgrMH-0007bA-Un for 14358@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 12:37:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 75so12963750pga.3 for <14358@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 09:37:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5UPDgmCqEdRTuN6hufTnnQYtbUMUDCS8eZXnQWJHK/E=; b=3F1/SjY9GeHb7KWXJnLtY7eswREZJlu8UcrnoCw2rbXcMrn2WsSATc2a62Qbq7piJQ Gh8CGWxTLD+q8tznqxqFW7EhaFX+7GCigZaG5nojIztLRA3PTWNVJnFHbdQfgE3/PmPt waX+FZqnYc+1r+zdaLLd/d3wR2Trhly/JR+IgRFjYLDKFVB6JzU+MwaXSATO2p+eNvJH k0DPzbkC4Ayb6cRVSXkbEk2Ndk6jDXVIaONxuMRhjqV1jnC/bVZIuh8v0FO7AqB82f1A bIlWnSCHbx0o2Nexke5pFoX6nm7fPHSXsdDzRlTQxreAAtcBj32HVq3qE8uTMnHpe5Ci okAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HDZiA/1wE0Zx/Sr1Fm0Sds9eAoTrGmzqSmqCMGeavCfweFtnv O7c+1hTPd2gcVXuqNISHALOhf2KHLipflFzr9I5T7Y9j X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvhxOf3hN6TJzS7fOaZiMRXzBf7PPy+S5peRKbjqUOs+o9xQXBctSVludEwkDoQHMOvgehZBSCkl3hJ7hvBr8= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:99c3:0:b0:47b:e21d:7315 with SMTP id v3-20020aa799c3000000b0047be21d7315mr17934475pfi.35.1635611844253; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 09:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 09:37:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <0n609nqjnw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 03 Dec 2017 22:03:15 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:218628 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Is it possible/desirable for Emacs to be able to use GraphicsMagick > instead of ImageMagick? I'm assuming they provide the same > functionality, but I know nothing about it. > > I has a rough'n'ready go at the trivial stuff (see below), but then gave > up with these errors: Glenn Morris writes: > There's no interest in addressing this issue. Closing as wontfix. Given that we are now no longer recommending ImageMagick, perhaps GraphicsMagick support feels more relevant now than it used to? >From my point of view, GraphicsMagick has better performance, half as many dependencies, and way fewer CVE's. Like ImageMagick, it also gives us "free" support for a ton of different image formats, and "free" new ones in the future. On the flip-side, I personally get by just fine with our built-in support for JPEG, GIF, SVG, PNG and some others (this list will include WEBP in Emacs 29.1). So I have no idea what need our users have for support for a wider range of image formats. One final consideration is that GraphicsMagick support could be a step towards making our ImageMagick support obsolete.