From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57407: closed (Re: bug#57407: [PATCH] Handle error of =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=99vc-registered=E2=80=99?=) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:04:23 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87lercwb0o.fsf@gmail.com> <87sexkj3ol.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11558"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Dmitry Gutov , 57407@debbugs.gnu.org To: Simon Tournier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 21:06:23 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sJe9u-0002s2-Bz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 21:06:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJe9b-0004dd-2c; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJe9Y-0004bV-0R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:06:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJe9X-0004Ts-J4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJe9a-0002Lj-1N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57407 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 57407-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57407.17187375358970 (code B ref 57407); Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57407) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2024 19:05:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJe98-0002Kb-WA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]:51352) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJe97-0002KB-4d for 57407@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:05:33 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a63359aaaa6so899899366b.2 for <57407@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:05:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718737464; x=1719342264; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=srgOoUQNmcF6reqyVzHjJpBj9+DkePHtsJ7dIWAim/4=; b=Je2SU7cSOWFffmpsPp4/GTIR9K3ntAQN9b/MU4CoRNRn2Zc/UPZ+V90WER4HlqYM7l KmGP/3G6hLbh9oPqRbg6lYI6jssk8vG+sBXhf9zATVo497+PiFtCtYF2J1Ryuo1wZ6hC vzTf7pOo3VilN1A0PpokuFxDth7M4MtBbl6lgCUGr1z/hIXrpX/rheU+qp8giPv3Elzg Q4C2EAhnMJvG26s82r1S+O7Y6TUdqAkyaAqsoYIbPCbupR52lK/JDBLmWA4gN6PUM0rW AFFEAg2gyysxpQL9VLgdjDJUwIMJdcfQiVeIN5UYZnF4ze1z2x7r8VWOAIj5k5LJ14yC pqcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718737464; x=1719342264; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=srgOoUQNmcF6reqyVzHjJpBj9+DkePHtsJ7dIWAim/4=; b=LBqCBB6JIXoLBr5JtYJl0bhVZ8tS6Xoc4HA3y2gOXkdyCIHz0BpCkKijnvLnWdr9Rw jD3H4e03zdRysynbmc2HFJ89mbLRoLekgIjd2JXA6zjZCQiHVqgMtYyIOl8IGKi4qa9E Hft0tuDwEcWsnQFfNIcw2tx6HCISXJOCAKjuQ+G3pFMeDA0jEf7dgs0S48spiLadoCcq R3wHw5H9yFdBM1Wnki2/fFyK3Y8F0IJiqxuCw91gw5fiQUKmnW8glLDO64Tmf9wfO+4V g1Ob4x3pKgvHFdaiQ1fiyvpIdK4pjftGcYho5sxxlUG1WMZv5zEKjZpjaZLhJh6xB4j0 1wjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwC5i3NQZ7VeZggNId5nO8XtQLuN6JtDWkfSLuuQB4Nx+HapCTr GGLRZeYgbISgpmkE/bBsC3VPNAesBpKX39MQr2msosGWovCYEkTQsJIW6n9SePI4oo/ZHOd6Qmg wXH8GUGsyViKfG5z7J+kSAjKSCn4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE9ssSywZxK5+RwNdQveY1nQDGiUWmNpjXF1bdchGX2Zv8z9dgAusOsVPoSoheyo3xvEiRtje2TYFU2YHmipd8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:168b:b0:a6f:5698:ab5b with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a6fab60bab5mr21216866b.8.1718737464228; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:04:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:04:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87sexkj3ol.fsf@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:287449 Archived-At: reopen 57407 thanks Simon Tournier writes: >>> That was one year ago. >>> >>> Simon, did you have a chance to look into the issues that Dmitry >>> mentioned below? >> >> More information was requested, but none was given within 9 months, so >> I'm closing this bug. If this is still an issue, please reply to this >> email (use "Reply to all" in your email client) and we can reopen the >> bug report. > > The issue is not gone, AFAICT. The cover letter provides a reproducer; > see below. OK, thanks, reopening the bug. > Well, I am not following very closely the development of Emacs master, > so I cannot tell with high confidence if a workaround introduced > elsewhere fixes the issue. However, from my quick look, the code that > triggers the spurious messages has not been changed. > > Sorry to not have the time to send a v2; I am running out of time. > However, closing this report: > > 1. Do not change that 991e145450ec8b02865597bc80fd797e39e81f07 is > clearly incorrect. It=E2=80=99s a regression > > 2. My patch, while imperfect, fixes such regression. Dmitry, what do you think of installing the proposed patch as is? Does it introduce any other regressions?