From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23033: 24.5; Lock file uses the same extension as the file it's locking Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:59:01 -0700 Message-ID: References: <8jy49fnrpl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pni3t129.fsf@marxist.se> <83eeyicxh7.fsf@gnu.org> <875zjutq51.fsf@marxist.se> <83imnta3y6.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0e19zcm.fsf@gnu.org> <878rzlqva7.fsf@gnus.org> <871r5dpeya.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3774"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 23033@debbugs.gnu.org, mgsloan@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 25 05:00:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxvB-0000kC-7h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 05:00:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53070 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxv9-0005UJ-CO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 23:00:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxv0-0005UA-QO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 23:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxv0-0007CV-ID for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 23:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxv0-00031C-Gx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 23:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 03:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23033 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 23033-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23033.163253875111498 (code B ref 23033); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 03:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23033) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2021 02:59:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59960 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxuA-0002zN-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:59:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]:34342) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTxu7-0002z5-Sg for 23033@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:59:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f44.google.com with SMTP id on12-20020a17090b1d0c00b001997c60aa29so8661022pjb.1 for <23033@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:59:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4oBih7pnIrSF3RMbytywHMa0iTJffJdAezEwl2qnrq0=; b=1kY2PmsaCZFVeu9Z85ea0wwY1ths9hbVqauq6wvH/aIb4N96r6GB7481ugGcfjCR1H DyMrZfai1mdDCk8OmR8sYx2vmMhUEjz07aNtjHxcRqQswt1AIFlU8oM5Zx4giZWc5IGJ XbksiN/YwIo2OmjY+XPpbjccSDcOVSBS66fSv6z+RYVPMZA1dLH1K0C1nhPqLtphH5wL OBtFvAqQ8v29I6uYn94eJ0bYfGrymd9akq7uBJzLsiR4AgkXvfBSWfHtFXAGVGTG8U41 cxIUU0clzWjbvDyREaiKhjVd/x9L9q0dBhv4y4DG2V/d42eHGEKJfhnush8oV2EH3HfB L2BA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JnSYLC0KvzVOsNhUERpSGkKLf1slLbZz+G0GSaLzTLBi2nD3F TbK7IGtPBGNny/ecmP3STTvCTgqNQwtBRjFqWBA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4gks1Zjm6Xn3X55mcuQMSBAqwk7pfvtNPzT2OTti+iHwjGD6Z1WPp/fpSdukwT6jXXKdgU+mfS1hTSN4+H7g= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3805:: with SMTP id mq5mr6046339pjb.143.1632538742004; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:59:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 19:59:01 -0700 In-Reply-To: <871r5dpeya.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215405 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> I also note that even with ".lock" the files are fairly close together, >> and they are also colored differently so they stand out. >> >> So from my perspective having the explanation ".lock" visible in the >> name is worth more than a slightly better sort order. > > But would adding .lock to them change the sort order much? Much? I'd say no. It changes a little, in most cases, e.g.: -rw-r--r-- 1 skangas skangas 0 2021-09-25 02:02 .#foo# -rw-r--r-- 1 skangas skangas 19 2021-09-25 03:33 foo -rw-r--r-- 1 skangas skangas 0 2021-09-25 02:02 foob -rw-r--r-- 1 skangas skangas 0 2021-09-25 02:01 foobar -rw-r--r-- 1 skangas skangas 0 2021-09-25 02:00 .#foo.lock I guess this starts to matter more when you have a ton of files named fooXXX.