From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51556: 29.0.50; Poor contrast of Customize SVG icons with dark backgrounds Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:44:45 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87v91b92v6.fsf@gmail.com> <83fssflmcg.fsf@gnu.org> <68034911-bc12-0c9e-cabb-c870628fd80c@gmail.com> <83a6imlo23.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuguk3h2.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0hqjywm.fsf@gnu.org> <83ee7yjxb1.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6imjv2o.fsf@gnu.org> <18066bc0-86a6-5901-9a53-e2c6ea13fbc8@gmail.com> <8335oejrn8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33179"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, 51556@debbugs.gnu.org, kevin.legouguec@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 02 20:45:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhzib-0008L3-JZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 20:45:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36388 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhzia-0001eg-27 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhziQ-0001cE-Go for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhziQ-00075h-7e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhziQ-0001JU-5n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51556 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 51556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51556.16358822935020 (code B ref 51556); Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2021 19:44:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38158 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhziH-0001Iu-Cy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:44:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:44788) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhziF-0001Id-Qy for 51556@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:44:52 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so420394plq.11 for <51556@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 12:44:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6A0w7mvRSTCwDAx90eHXs0zMW+pDXVCFCT0/8IxgvtI=; b=3X+CWcVCYySg8jDce5nlxpQJKEVfXfo/A2YliG9f8KWfJZDjvbOZEQaIKegn3Yd90E /Z0JZpqTAKRsM8np9VEVV+FajgwoGmTt7khvOjiUBlAjCF080wUU802coC4xx8Hv7xch fRmdRhsi7YGEBEjd+oK2CTI11r7F9fzlwCgbmmJcIlCt6LZosYzFOadZ+iPfu3fP5+i0 yH6aPNRCG6kJRbXPe+JS3Cc38SG2tXYSQyUgJW3V/KrDCRmKdz05kK9FFYVLuxEf0afk 6a6YqGVFP3DfR+HVH4Os3ep5Fo7n9zOW7GtdaS0SmxxnPkFreqZwfLGsN4YtM4kKij78 yWUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300mPGZulW7J3hL0FOEA9TlfRv5e/jhqov9LwoNP9FTWoqZNj3A o1sDJcr+n9YQ/8RdAk1UwcbbkecrDqDVAy7xFKQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw62GRxn3fgh4jYIH6ReAjWw4cmlN93366LaxhUXSEWJi0XPeiMs4ZWMMxAgZRcKCsz5sMgOPdgs6t0saySy3g= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8c93:b0:141:5442:e608 with SMTP id t19-20020a1709028c9300b001415442e608mr33676753plo.32.1635882286012; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 12:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:44:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <8335oejrn8.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:218832 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > If you're the author of a little-known package, you can't really >> > expect theme authors to provide customized icons for your package that >> > fit with the theme. However, themes *do* specify at least a handful of >> > faces. As a package author, it would be convenient to be able to say >> > "render this icon using the foreground color of the `error' face", for >> > example. Then your package looks good with most themes without >> > requiring anyone to provide custom SVGs. >> >> Exactly the point. This goes for built-in packages as well. > > How come built-in packages qualify as "little-known"? They don't. I'm saying that the above points apply whether or not a package is "little-known", "well-known" or even "built-in".