From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38730: 27.0.50; tutorial start does not take into account the customization notice Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:57:40 -0700 Message-ID: References: <441821C4-EE9B-40E8-970A-13B3C720C07D@traduction-libre.org> <83blrxwx1n.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18487"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Jean-Christophe Helary , 38730-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 26 00:58:23 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kAhtX-0004j9-FP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:58:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37780 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAhtW-0005EK-Hx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:58:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAhtD-0004wQ-Hd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAhtD-0007u5-89 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAhtD-0002X5-7r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:58:03 -0400 Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:58:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 38730 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 38730@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, jean.christophe.helary@traduction-libre.org Original-Received: via spool by 38730-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D38730.15983962739685 (code D ref 38730); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:58:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38730-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2020 22:57:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36389 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAht2-0002W9-Uv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:57:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-f178.google.com ([209.85.219.178]:35418) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAhsv-0002Vf-Tt for 38730-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:57:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-f178.google.com with SMTP id y134so171968yby.2 for <38730-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:57:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8uYHuVAPX/EYX7vxNFgmeVn3f03Ggt8KONfCgPzrlfg=; b=WyFjrxYembZPPq4YBXuGttMLLsRxBpxeZuTc25MEw/AmqidmUFLp+GZg0A/9gqu5xB WHP1DNMTzwdPMpI60/OhAbbdEtaQSITN6Rt+M1ZfnKHJjVCsmCyRg7BMkCbnQ19Y/Ea3 l0dipRh1DD+c9ZoS25okvICA4aN5KNrVT/cc0pyC69+N4I7+VDJP1QKNCsVXHcBpiSci Ohcd5olHzLxmoOBhtl1xDJqbHzk5ThonSfTyHpqrc/tiTAX7Q+TVeYKMSo7MDC/EuYkG d1n9N6Kbhm5Q04Z4ICmqvX6ajbqyinpdiHGekBv3mUBQRms7m1M0J1mUPQXoQfzIkVdv Igew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wvPn6GRqXidhvJIOrOUx7HJz+rB98evsPnjRymB/rFmRVVpv+ WsBHqicc0dxgWpdmq5SxICjDN5I9LCu+gQanozbjllKF X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxkBPH4Kn0pBHWj/o8LICgmysXkm2sC+WwGPpQgWXSwcMjVEQ9mL3XHhMbDzOGqH4UkhHdilmXPY/lVWzHXxbc= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:410:: with SMTP id m16mr17008781ybp.309.1598396260447; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:57:40 -0700 In-Reply-To: <83blrxwx1n.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 24 Dec 2019 17:41:40 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186364 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Jean-Christophe Helary >> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 18:37:57 +0900 >> >> When starting the Tutorial in an emacs session that has modified >> keybindings, an information notice is displayed in red/bold characters at the top of the screen. >> >> That notice pushes the first step of the tutorial to below the visible space >> of the frame. The user thus cannot see the first step and has to manually >> scroll down to see it, which defeats the purpose of that first step where the >> user learns to use C-v to move one screenful down... > > I'm not sure what use case is described here. If keybindings have > been modified, we probably aren't talking about a complete newcomer to > Emacs, so at least simple cursor motion should already be a skill > he/she already acquired, right? He/she might already know to scroll > with PgDn or the mouse wheel, right? > > OTOH, in a customized session, we can reasonably expect to see a > window that is larger than the default shown by "emacs -Q", and maybe > then the beginning of the tutorial will still be visible? > > And if none of the above helps, then what kind of solution would you > propose for such a situation? I agree with Eli, and there has been no no further replies here within 35 weeks. I'm therefore going to assume the above reply resolved the problem and close this bug now. If this conclusion is incorrect, please reply to this email (use "Reply to all" in your email client) and we can reopen the bug report. Best regards, Stefan Kangas