From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68075: 30.0.50; New special form `handler-bind` Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:50:44 -0800 Message-ID: References: <835y0i92kb.fsf@gnu.org> <83le9c3z6k.fsf@gnu.org> <83wmsu17x6.fsf@gnu.org> <83le9911id.fsf@gnu.org> <83h6jx0xez.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19098"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 68075@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 05 01:52:39 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rLYRy-0004kb-Ka for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 01:52:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLYRM-0003a1-N3; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:52:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLYRK-0003Zf-Go for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:51:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLYRK-0000Yy-7s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:51:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLYRN-0008S5-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:52:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68075 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68075-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68075.170441586432422 (code B ref 68075); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68075) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2024 00:51:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLYQO-0008QX-NZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:51:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::535]:42253) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLYQJ-0008QF-8c for 68075@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:50:59 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-55731d88563so5732a12.1 for <68075@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 16:50:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704415845; x=1705020645; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d5SiXyFTSYIK6gXjSbHlIwOGibGYXvFVQiaeWMx9dSY=; b=c4Vw1otw8rAgqh/uA9Ii0ZOjjW1kcWqNJMR2XypRcRFv+r1ZzetEhb/clOHSD2ftVC 45pfqlnV8ovdVb2Urt2E4me5uxCpQLSDvgBydoeuzwlejH76MlXSVDo+9Agw1uanPPBm wAOwiVUr3hlNz5B2Lg1yC+enCbyaKM8aas8Lw1KZbi8P7+FoQoK9FLM/VqJcbP79dnpm uBTKFyfNOlKplc+0rgTps3EB9CaRtLhFGUGH+kBwC2rWQdAURiHyoHBGM+nZ0wCgN4gL 9AJomgM4ja8u9PBEQZjG6/+QmADQpV6HLdCLLisB8gg6SmTK8qsJINKtffc5fi5jR429 PbIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704415845; x=1705020645; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d5SiXyFTSYIK6gXjSbHlIwOGibGYXvFVQiaeWMx9dSY=; b=X3W/6o8RCpwgKlJKSb7KI2yPfMRAlBVhPH17DPpiRpXK2SFTwxZgv2DB95DtnEBt8C EmkH8dunIGH1lbMvdV/+XnhlobxQK0NM0OQi/osp6MhWo2C1mdsVhgpYIehVntrSnt1C JIO+Y5lQWnngwnE/UaO0Chc3L0Hn/ZT3JbzmbIFo2rE0ZGXWkV2kTw4nqFirL+2ODR7z gmppH3vquUomND5T0dxAOadHP8jx/KY1j9ppBlXsZIKepoo91Vdg4/dG6WWGYoxfVpIX Ctm8tsU8lhGJ5VohyQVrt3splYZCOxKJy3q/qQb9bziEb7Wn88p8l9K3gSa5dONFeC9w vEUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxC66ZAFuSgP9Eq3AqDcADKg2LoeuW3btTYkksZ3snNurRE1PeH gsbdD/KLIFGBJPA6lzsBNzK4Skf0UvpReleadSP8Ea5q X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFFGmYsKML0u5X7yBWWQjYaTce+1rKhxTM3xtYDieWOsJ3aMJU4iO0ZjstevGodI8OgFCrcaMGCrmQ7tiNZgy0= X-Received: by 2002:a50:ab4a:0:b0:553:bdae:be61 with SMTP id t10-20020a50ab4a000000b00553bdaebe61mr1342649edc.39.1704415844676; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 16:50:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:50:44 -0800 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277351 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" writes: >> And please don't use "statically scoped", > > I use it in email messages, because I consider it to be the better term, > from a technical point of view. But indeed, I don't use it in the docs, > because it's too late to fix it there. I'm thumbing through my Dragon book for other reasons and they say "static scope or lexical scope". The index item for "lexical scope" says "see static scope". We already have an index entry for "dynamic scope" in the elisp manual. Would it make sense to add an index item for "static scope" too?