From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62751: 29.0.90; New libraries that still need to be assigned to packages Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 08:46:46 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87zg7fyjka.fsf@bernoul.li> <87wmwobgk6.fsf@bernoul.li> <87msxjzeyq.fsf@bernoul.li> <83jzs68n08.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37864"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 62751@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 01 17:48:06 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyft-0009Xu-PE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 17:48:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyfc-0002Nk-6K; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:47:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyfa-0002NN-Ap for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:47:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyfa-0007An-34 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:47:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyfp-0004ad-Hu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 15:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62751 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62751-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62751.169617523117494 (code B ref 62751); Sun, 01 Oct 2023 15:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62751) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2023 15:47:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35179 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyf0-0004Y5-K4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]:61768) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyey-0004Xq-P9 for 62751@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:47:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-32325534cfaso10899919f8f.3 for <62751@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 08:46:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696175207; x=1696780007; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0FOAn2auVjqcBS7VaKqsviOs6acOAmrz9H7kOTi8VQM=; b=Vl0bgr0IN7BXp9SGJeTZJxtL/rz/T7CrKIewxQM8mpxBz3DsqZicZUzaEj0RjGFocN VxvC5GiCllmCqcZZR9vd+HgmQPF77zo+2/HFZwC0O2S6zEHdAxH+79TnwquFX5XGghHU G9+jpRHee4zJLRQ4r19dJ7X4WzBRCYkb4FSgeXu4h29b5yYmDchMve1KYTx4U4jImnt0 hc2MAesNjlUuEA4K+vEzidISp9MMWQU544yY/7iDB6kgQ0y02yvyssBCZLsQ9UYFcBQf 9hp+25UtmGrEPYwYRyN61lYkDPzpr2h3rMw1H7kcM/DoTy9hYpbMgYUd2e+WRuA8u3DQ kCbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696175207; x=1696780007; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0FOAn2auVjqcBS7VaKqsviOs6acOAmrz9H7kOTi8VQM=; b=tCK3Q17ow4D1S6o5sX7m+PWoq1X9xF03CfqBDr5oYmzMZEC6gfBZw5wbWk4qbGOwlP 85vh4+Np88CxRAQTn+N2Bbo2+8ZrXYyptMLIOUPbZQ6CtGxig9RCWLfYkrQjGoYIVFky yuG65Of0nRZx86q0ODAC66ilQDZiyrHgYV1PUMHj9v/aySjC3xUbWBBl+ZGLwYwyHb/p cZTRUurJz7pNMy0CEVrfVOUvPgi/9V4CkZ8/kW5kBc0IwwCJ3wGoZgGdkv625q2Ixy3W yLpVfsuFKBuHZWJTFGM+l3Ts4zmKh3qRiQN4T7fsSXHHQKi7tHJ8mn6op4ywfZMdETjl Ofrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw0fAPXNyYXlSDLVjTVxwVYZzUhRr/f9RB5aZuQPv25lWrL3u4a L+9dlWN43/CfBxUkHqz4aCe1JtKAv4+MRdlnx5M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFPXofAtCZU2hkBjNr4tU4QG5DmVcdlzFwAjnMLfyG/6HeT5gfku+9BavuZM8UJZ9Js6spL5twh/N6NRgoq6CM= X-Received: by 2002:adf:de11:0:b0:320:896:5ea8 with SMTP id b17-20020adfde11000000b0032008965ea8mr7961498wrm.19.1696175206586; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 08:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 08:46:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: <83jzs68n08.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:271626 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I installed the below patch on emacs-29 to take care of this part. >> >> diff --git a/admin/make-tarball.txt b/admin/make-tarball.txt >> index 505d3469d3c..5704e8e8922 100644 >> --- a/admin/make-tarball.txt >> +++ b/admin/make-tarball.txt >> @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ Steps to take before starting on the first pretest >> in any release sequence: >> You can use 'gnupload --delete' (see below for more gnupload details). >> (We currently don't bother with this.) >> >> +4. Check that all new Lisp libraries belong to sensible packages. >> + Run "make -C lisp finder-data" and check the diff of the generated >> + file against the previously released Emacs version to see what has >> + changed. >> + > > This could benefit from some criteria for what is and isn't reasonable > in these diffs, or what to do with the differences. Because otherwise > "check the diff" doesn't tell how to check it. I didn't put anything, because I don't know how to summarize that in a few short words. Ideas for how to do that are welcome.