From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32629: 26; `buffer-list-update-hook' doc string Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 03:45:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="43393"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 32629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 03 03:47:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iFqD1-000BBC-UY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 03:47:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60534 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFqD0-0007AC-3I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 21:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFqCt-00079k-BL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 21:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFqCs-0006qb-BM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 21:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFqCs-0006qX-7F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 21:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFqCs-0002tK-3n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 21:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 01:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 32629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32629.157006717011015 (code B ref 32629); Thu, 03 Oct 2019 01:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2019 01:46:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38602 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFqC2-0002rZ-3S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 21:46:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:42440) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFqBx-0002qt-BC for 32629@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 21:46:07 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id e5so699905pls.9 for <32629@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 18:46:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G7pE2gE4SOkVrIPjVG2E7caXjd39BJ3kZ9lxbZ+i4V8=; b=iwDsdltwrEhnrpJL9eJ7x7PuEl/GSj/i1HBJA4CeEYAFRRUCz9FkY7mB1zluXpU5K9 2RdvLJcQn+XNsWS2u3G3iKU1P08blQQlGUfiTBuDJ0aAGnc0pStNzQR5IMOc0mSy59Mp EGFm0Js4bCFvsKCgKtYvv998vnOjmRS33YqyxAHIPDVG1WYOD3nqg6PbRvlKxkFNp0nx d8slyQo0eclWHmeXU5kqnC8S2HImq4roHlDkIaIgoQCQVJ6WN0JiAxzwyXOPwWECZ6MS 3lKNFTsHXw4xdoTh+DYbvcxV7wQQzwst9FKOzk91TgfY8VsRBcudzpTfxk4Go2wYEe+R t7VA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVRVVCzU6INryNSC61+oiBoWVoVrdPDvvNTBuZNKYNDLSW9sg6U pjtpZmKRAO9+97jDtnWbstQoKvvefdh7X0cRI4k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwBTqZJwfwNQqKji5bi+9yoa6XrqfjmS/MV9wV60ogNQ+5HxCXlHC++LvCZeZiVvKK8ucJBpJKWPSKWapU27Qw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a515:: with SMTP id s21mr7199870plq.259.1570067159568; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 18:45:59 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168193 Archived-At: tags 32629 + wontfix close 32629 thanks Drew Adams writes: >> > > > The doc string should not list the functions that run the hook. >> > > >> > > Why not? >> > >> > Same reason we don't do that elsewhere (do we?). >> >> I see no reason for such a stringent consistency. > > No, there's no need for a stringent consistency. > That's generally true. > >> Of course not. But in this case doing that makes sense. >> Because it tells one indirectly what changes are considered to "update >> the buffer list". > > OK. Thanks for thinking about it. The conclusion here was that the doc string is fine as it is. Closing. Best regards, Stefan Kangas