unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, rms@gnu.org
Cc: mattiase@acm.org, 41006@debbugs.gnu.org, rtm443x@googlemail.com
Subject: bug#41006: 26.3; regular expressions documentation
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 03:10:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADwFkmmq9KiE7W1wSwEQvN2K6QEZivwuheqM0RxLT5269Wn41A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <831rnukjn1.fsf@gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Now we have
>>
>> >   > * Regular Expressions::   Describing classes of strings.
>> >   > * Regexp Search::         Searching for a match for a regexp.
>>
>> We could convert Regexp Search into a subsection under Regular
>> Expressions.  I don't see any harm in doing that.

I'm glad to hear that.

> Let's first decide whether we are talking about the Emacs user manual,
> the ELisp reference manual, or both.  The current organization of this
> stuff is slightly different in each one.  The OP meant the user
> manual, AFAIU.

Yes, I brought up the ELisp manual.  Sorry to bring this related issue
into this discussion without clearly marking it as such.

> To answer the specific question you asked: this is all part of a
> chapter called "Searching and Replacement" in the user manual and
> "Searching and Matching" in the ELisp manual.  So having there a
> section called "Regular Expressions" which would include a subsection
> about regexp search makes less sense to me than the other way around:
> have a section "Regular Expression Search" which would start with
> syntax of regexps and go on to a subsection that describes the regexp
> search facilities (it should then probably include the "POSIX Regexps"
> section as well).

I see your point here.

In the user manual, perhaps we could re-organize what we have now
(excluding other subsections for the sake of brevity):

* Searching and Replacement
** Regexp Search::             Search for match for a regexp.
** Regexps::                   Syntax of regular expressions.
** Regexp Backslash::          Regular expression constructs starting with ‘\’.
** Regexp Example::            A complex regular expression explained.

Into something like:

* Searching and Replacement
** Regular Expression Search   Search for match for a regexp.
*** Regexp Syntax::             Syntax of regular expressions.
*** Regexp Backslash::          Regular expression constructs starting with ‘\’.
*** Regexp Example::            A complex regular expression explained.

I think one needs to look at it in the context of the user manual, and
what the Info node `(emacs) Search' looks like to fully understand the
merit of your argument.  Every other subheading in that chapter is
called something with "<foo> Search" (besides one, which is called
"Replace").

---

In the ELisp manual, I think it could fine to have a section called
simply "Regular Expressions".  Either the user already knows about
regexps, in which case we have no problem, or the user does not know but
will soon find out.

I argue this only because I find the shorter name more elegant.  This is
a minor stylistic point, though, and I'm fine with "Regular Expression
Search" there, too.

In any case, it looks like it needs a bit more work.  There are actually
bits and pieces about regular expressions spread out in the chapter
`(elisp) Searching and Matching':

* Regular Expressions::   Describing classes of strings.
* Regexp Search::         Searching for a match for a regexp.
* POSIX Regexps::         Searching POSIX-style for the longest match.
* Match Data::            Finding out which part of the text matched,
                            after a string or regexp search.
* Search and Replace::    Commands that loop, searching and replacing.
* Standard Regexps::      Useful regexps for finding sentences, pages,...

Moving "Regexp Search" into a more general section called "Regular
Expressions" is a step in the right direction.  But then comes the
problem with finding match data, which is part of the "Match Data"
section, or using `re-search-forward', which is in the "Search and
Replace" section.  I have found all this information to be hard to find
in the past.

Maybe we can take a small first step here.  But perhaps this section
needs a bigger rethink?

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas





  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-08 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-01 19:06 bug#41006: 26.3; regular expressions documentation jan via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2020-05-03  3:40 ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-03 10:31   ` jan via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2020-05-03 13:07 ` Mattias Engdegård
2020-05-03 14:00   ` jan via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2020-05-03 20:08   ` Drew Adams
2020-05-03 20:31     ` Stefan Kangas
2020-05-04  1:00       ` Drew Adams
2020-05-05  2:56       ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-05 10:05         ` jan via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2020-05-05 16:51           ` Mattias Engdegård
2020-05-05 18:20         ` Stefan Kangas
2020-05-05 18:40           ` Drew Adams
2020-05-05 19:04             ` Stefan Kangas
2020-05-05 19:42               ` Drew Adams
2020-05-05 21:23                 ` Stefan Kangas
2020-05-05 21:37                   ` Drew Adams
2020-05-07  2:40                   ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-09  3:48               ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-07  2:41             ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-07  3:17               ` Drew Adams
2020-05-08  2:51                 ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-07 10:31               ` Stefan Kangas
2020-05-07  2:41           ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-07  3:18             ` Drew Adams
2020-05-07 10:32             ` Stefan Kangas
2020-05-08  2:49               ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-08  6:47                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-08 10:10                   ` Stefan Kangas [this message]
2020-05-08 10:31                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-08 18:17                       ` Stefan Kangas
2020-05-08 18:47                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-08 20:09                           ` Stefan Kangas
2020-05-08 10:04                 ` jan via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2020-05-09  3:56                   ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-08 16:49                 ` Drew Adams
2020-05-09  3:53                   ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-09  3:54                   ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-07  2:41           ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-04  3:10   ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-04  9:13     ` jan via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2020-05-05  2:56       ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-05 10:02         ` jan via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2020-05-05 17:12     ` Mattias Engdegård
2020-05-05 17:40       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-05 17:50         ` jan via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2020-05-05 18:09         ` Stefan Kangas
2020-05-05 18:23           ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-07  2:42       ` Richard Stallman
2022-04-29 12:22 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CADwFkmmq9KiE7W1wSwEQvN2K6QEZivwuheqM0RxLT5269Wn41A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=stefan@marxist.se \
    --cc=41006@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=mattiase@acm.org \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=rtm443x@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).