From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29420: 26.0; doc of `list-packages' Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:57:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83zhhx6xsr.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhhv4dfa.fsf@gnu.org> <8336fk24dx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="265301"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 29420@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 23 17:12:53 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIJh-0016qc-Eu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:12:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39110 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIJf-00011N-R0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:12:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34119) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI5L-0005bv-D3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI5K-0007nA-FB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI5J-0007mf-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI5J-0001mz-J4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29420 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 29420-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29420.15718426596851 (code B ref 29420); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29420) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2019 14:57:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34795 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI4x-0001mR-8c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:57:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f176.google.com ([209.85.215.176]:33763) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI4v-0001mA-B9 for 29420@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:57:37 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f176.google.com with SMTP id u23so1621673pgo.0 for <29420@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 07:57:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yEUd2MS57uFoaMdZakL1fU2M9kjQy3Be4THDzfOnwkg=; b=dVNCrG+16jVIzzqg1kOz2Y3rbsS3awRjZC0TpD2bxNlIvrI2sGJQfLFsDW4RGId4+S jlSqBRgZRHgzRGoPZPMPEfRVxl8Nx5pxc+VESS3kbeVcTr8fXkzToyCq9svVsWU/gjUl dr/zl1Li1BDo9/pu3QbcBCTKlTH26bOY104WB88oZ3rySmYJl/ZJxJefg2Mn4e4Et7X9 p9wGxVPWmwwD9SVZfWXslNU48AyCqL56WvzYtg4W10UimMEr+9W07mMeS8IGA/P98AsN lCv/CezuogNAWau/R2ME3QgZtpq0/AfARrVtz73hhKJwgdBAtdWsouEI8qd+PzSh8so4 ujLw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXgK3blBdDx/KlcsDr6jbtVcuWl/HLqe/VQ0oS8qz3l71DGHIff y7Va/xthfioNvyIhDqnypNcg9A5WaKk54JJqK4s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx0+gECO+/aVbDDvRafgdZ8wjgeQhZk0OvwhBYKJ4Q4BUcJ/B+OqwzJjlixpJPDh1LpCh762Y+S91+BBWCf0oM= X-Received: by 2002:a63:1c03:: with SMTP id c3mr10157533pgc.198.1571842651386; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 07:57:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8336fk24dx.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170071 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > +@subsection Package Menu Commands > > Maybe use @unnumberedsubsec instead of @section, as having it numbered > might confuse someone into thinking it's a node. I could do that, but I worry that it would make the manual less consistent. I get no hits in doc/emacs for @unnumberedsubsec but 257 hits for @subsection. In doc/, @unnumberedsubsec is only used in doc/lispintro (where I get 37 hits). Perhaps its better to lean towards consistency in this case? If we want to use @unnumberedsubsec more, I'm happy to do the change though. It's your call. Best regards, Stefan Kangas