From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
To: Michael Arndt <michael@rndt.dev>, 72750@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: kobarity <kobarity@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#72750: 29.3; indent-region changes semantics of python code
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 07:56:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADwFkmmPsEC=u-B0QiC8Qgo6ME8Te36+VhbQctyi-UwW_GAF=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6bcd988-1cba-46dd-b2ef-2e02c1a169d7@rndt.dev>
Michael Arndt via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of
text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> writes:
> I have a problem when indenting python files. There seems to be a case
> when using indent-region changes the semantics of the python code. When
> there is no blank line after an if-statement, the next line becomes part
> of the if statement.
>
> The problem can be reproduced by the following steps:
>
> 1. Start emacs -Q
> 2. Create a python file with the following contents:
>
> if False:
> print("output1")
> print("output2")
>
> 3. Use M-x mark-whole-buffer
> 4. Use M-x indent-region
> 5. The file contents change into:
>
> if False:
> print("output1")
> print("output2")
>
> The problem can be avoided by adding a blank line after the if statement.
> Because I use a custom indentation function that calls (indent-region
> (point-min) (point-max)) this can happen pretty quickly. Is this a
> limitation of python-indent-region?
I'm not sure that I see a bug here. I don't think one can generally
expect `indent-region` to be able to avoid changing semantics in a
language where indentation matters.
I'm copying in kobarity, in case he has any comments.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-21 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 18:06 bug#72750: 29.3; indent-region changes semantics of python code Michael Arndt via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-08-23 18:52 ` Andreas Röhler
2024-09-21 11:56 ` Stefan Kangas [this message]
2024-09-21 14:51 ` kobarity
2024-09-21 16:03 ` Michael Arndt via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-09-22 1:05 ` Stefan Kangas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADwFkmmPsEC=u-B0QiC8Qgo6ME8Te36+VhbQctyi-UwW_GAF=g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=stefankangas@gmail.com \
--cc=72750@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=kobarity@gmail.com \
--cc=michael@rndt.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).