From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66779: 30.0.50; Gnus Article faces are not applied if attachment Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:00:11 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87y1fkcmlm.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <659ee5b0.7b0a0220.8255c.d22cSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12632"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: control@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Bidar , 66779@debbugs.gnu.org, Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 10 22:01:56 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rNfi0-00033L-9i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:01:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNfhC-0003O9-6n; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:01:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNfhA-0003Mx-Qf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:01:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNfhA-0003o6-FM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:01:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNfh8-0008DI-IV; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 21:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66779 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 66779-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66779.170492042027184 (code B ref 66779); Wed, 10 Jan 2024 21:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2024 21:00:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43290 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNfgR-00073C-BG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:00:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]:47489) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNfgP-0006hh-87; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:00:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3367a304091so4173997f8f.3; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:00:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704920412; x=1705525212; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=LFcJYm920w7X5J2VA7bHItRR7FkBJw9r0DmI6zKfLMA=; b=lNGa74IvOOAsnzUT3XkxZa5+ivHSlmx9CzkzrY9Ux5XrxwEjMCeFJseCf/AnuOsitU v+I2Zgyjo2p6KVguXwMTrRR63U/sxUqhE3+8QBQT4Sm4JSOciWZlHWkwYfPkkhv7eQMx I2+hiv7HWstx7gNrhR8qF+Yvn2PAlBFRCO28gK8dASEEySn1Q4cGZw5xe78s5a2CDNHE W+EDfnvUg2mnPr30Ex5cIjNwwQT3v7TibgslUVlA1YrYQ29PAbLM6yXHOGpCaAWQsz40 6BurImpKEoSYfbu1w0UCJBWWQM46N84ne2Ad3Z3RCKtQsJ7agBCuSJFbpp6lcMnCoaUg VkZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704920412; x=1705525212; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LFcJYm920w7X5J2VA7bHItRR7FkBJw9r0DmI6zKfLMA=; b=KCK6x6BIpf2gYlKjrZO66VJefrcQD/AehtOrU3QQX+52bqyvETL1tmWGijRObURMOc GL4gT0syTNRHDu78DiJ35Ot4WA6ky0IJ+StONZT4tpnpbPH5q7HgnLAsHzeDhwbbMptc O5ZTwQZQiUjux2mxk+u4cj7dbsWb+0WJ2raV+ew9JOnF5b+BZH7tNxXCPEE/7vx4SF3h uBxSQI7DDMBTwDrVyEzeXc392MXFsGeuQ4u/XQVCBBqMIr3u/rtwbrht+VlIpEXvwjWR E9t5Q69p1tNyWVLfxPjMY+wNlFj4Os2S1pWCgUubokmORJB/MCQR8/YP8QQ+L6tMNJUm NOHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyS/X7uzxzjBSztdp6P8BFCfJPv23nWh1S2m1fLNFSJB6mGZSt7 5eI3LtoHs2wE8n2Yw+cCcPR6ievqAPDHPKUYMQ0t5pTkR1yJ5A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFHtftAY9ZV5M5R/yl+vQMO5sXBfT2b7XXPHjWyu4R35/99IQpnUoKFa5LSHEeS3utTRdiZlsGkqHSHpH6hpA0= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:468d:0:b0:337:6bbb:26b2 with SMTP id u13-20020a5d468d000000b003376bbb26b2mr30867wrq.8.1704920412294; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:00:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:00:11 -0800 In-Reply-To: <659ee5b0.7b0a0220.8255c.d22cSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277820 Archived-At: reopen 66779 thanks Bj=C3=B6rn Bidar writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> Manuel Giraud writes: >> >>> Bj=C3=B6rn Bidar writes: >>> >>>> * Description >>>> When an article contains an attachment faces for things >>>> such as cites are not applied in the article buffer. >>>> An example would be an article containing a signature or >>>> an html and text part. >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I cannot reproduce. I have reply to a mail (citing its content) and ad= d >>> a file as attachment. The cited part is correctly rendered with the >>> 'gnus-cite-1' face. >>> >>> Don't you think it could come from HTML rendering (or washing)? >> >> No further comments within 2 months, so I'm closing this bug. > > Sorry oversaw the email/forgot to reply. In case you still want my > reply: Thanks, and we do of course. Reopening the bug. > I was explicitly talking about the text part of the email, > so nothing regarding rendering. > I also don't do any washing. > > Did you also had a multipart email with text/html and text/plain when > you tried to reproduce?