From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25097: 25.1; Scratch buffer flashes with emacsclient and xterm Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:18:22 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87vabwl4pf.fsf@gmail.com> <83o8ngnecn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19273"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jake.waksbaum@gmail.com, npostavs@gmail.com, 25097@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 12 16:19:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k5ray-0004s4-8h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 16:19:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51944 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rax-0000VI-Aa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:19:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rao-0000Tw-RL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rao-0002AR-IF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rao-0000Og-Dr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25097 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 25097-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25097.15972419111468 (code B ref 25097); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25097) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2020 14:18:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5raI-0000Nc-Uf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:18:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-f174.google.com ([209.85.219.174]:35419) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5raH-0000NB-8x for 25097@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:18:29 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-f174.google.com with SMTP id y134so1460162yby.2 for <25097@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:18:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8CFZleTQPpCJfSrwY4rKFWEVit3D3tgX9xXan+jjngE=; b=Il1j5xGk8wjHSb79NGfhuJUdCIY0zx8GRSNWBrCsKUQ0p8YSE6/TCDwBuUWgXVDnE1 QCqw7Uxz6Uh6B+vJby3oGz3tfjj0rhLj10PO+HBa0myUF/BdTtl/jPJ41eEhL+33seaR gjrMHYp52G1iaydIDdhXOi1YUMDQEJ9FLYnETXrbZcaC4KHgIoSG5qUPs8lIrnDL4oIl vz4fgDknt7CevLv3PQVH9ur5oo3A8t+QOz4AN7FNUcM/KbVMsV3sjSPIbtLONrxpCC5Y Z9VvKCGyAVwQEBXOAAxYJLW10UUMBrGy6eQLel1w7DzFz7xDp8XwSBKQGThka3Ibq1RB 4Hhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Y1q94Ec0g47+4aE/N9eTqsgm/wcG/ChEu9825tkzr/0xNraAA 8PE7iZHZ6zmcjrfI43BBFswf4RsG67sJcxgz9TBRCG15Ew4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoO518V6CuCRjhBi/1rFOBNs8cY9z8vCeut4vjA3yNjAwCXKme3leUHPUnzrrRgYB7tVx5B484Qz7D0rjtyV4= X-Received: by 2002:a25:9843:: with SMTP id k3mr307612ybo.466.1597241903986; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:18:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: <83o8ngnecn.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184807 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Should we just go ahead and change it, then? From reading the SE >> comment, there seems to be no concrete reason to not set it to nil by >> default. > > I don't see how such a conclusion follows from that discussion; what > did I miss? That's mainly in reference to this comment: There is a comment in xterm--query saying "Maybe we could always use the asynchronous approach, but it's less tested." In other words, the timeout was left in because of worries about adverse side effects. But there aren't any known problems for the asynch method (as far as I can see). =E2=80=93 npostavs May 9 '18 at 16:00 Best regards, Stefan Kangas