From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:09:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87v9tsv65b.fsf@gnus.org> <87ef0grneg.fsf@gnus.org> <83r24fwjwm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="73851"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 37420@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 17 11:10:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9V8-000J71-5T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:10:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42992 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9V6-0005z9-H7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:10:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9Uq-0005pc-JJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9Up-0004UL-Ie for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9Uo-0004To-9E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9Uo-0003Cz-0f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37420 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 37420-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37420.156871138412299 (code B ref 37420); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37420) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2019 09:09:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9UW-0003CJ-DI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f182.google.com ([209.85.210.182]:36260) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iA9UU-0003C6-Bl for 37420@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:09:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f182.google.com with SMTP id y22so1784758pfr.3 for <37420@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 02:09:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kW1Q4VwIQgjo+fOZ2wqspKlsmlZdPpeCEJsX6iu0yIM=; b=qEP+CX1nULSwP3rPuu0f+ZY0DxmLXdk5gjy3Fy5upNVRyzarf2KUXDwJR9+FmqhQC5 I41f/TZfucXpUnvzR/9S79pzpYVAgrs9NCVf+qElfays0+9u36yQ6XCXX3lCCRfBNFIu kP7LtObhDyukkPMFSdFAI6iIHRoKC58mUecEWbvsUR+lAtzhHYes1ahw7XqkoNGCIfKG NK2FkbJernOVfFtm30f+FRze5uDU+aMncAk6noXT9ZVFMzI0pFNjoCEGOhDj4uVrjRuv U1A9AdJYMT5wVVIRCNZO9tEc+NCLIxRbaq5ihF8G3xZrVOJuiNAZRx9o2N24oATLFX1e q8Kw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXkYHgzjhFxdC+9IkqL6mGT9kz3zlW/audtC8c4QjMtbFFRL+/p aI0gHJfNDNl3+6PC3+vnqAgGjbbmr8Y1TrJYB+UvgQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy/M0fLjVjij/HLfbegTZiFUW+ys3qPv/89FnFws9yLcBci0jT6DIepggaXVn+S7poBOJJJb60HthTbYcRBQ5I= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:17ab:: with SMTP id q40mr3901247pja.106.1568711376290; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 02:09:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r24fwjwm.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166622 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > (I also changed so the doc strings consistently say SHA-1 instead of > > > SHA1, which seems to be more correct AFAICT.) > > > > Yup. > > Should we perhaps do something to help those who know this under the > name "SHA1"? Is there any risk that some users believe that these would be two different algorithms? My guess would be no, but I might be wrong. Best regards, Stefan Kangas