From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47574: 'match' face is too bright Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:55:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83wntjeus0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37062"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 47574@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 14 16:56:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgwD-0009Vw-2e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 16:56:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgwC-0007is-1s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:56:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgvy-0007ea-En for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52181) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgvy-00034x-B0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgvy-0004QI-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47574 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47574-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47574.161841213616964 (code B ref 47574); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2021 14:55:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35493 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgvX-0004PX-NC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:55:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:47088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgvV-0004PJ-DA for 47574@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:55:33 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id m18so8036932plc.13 for <47574@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 07:55:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3Sw05TMkWNGgsFtcBCSX5pZWTkKeZuszHmVf7VAAzNk=; b=kd+nRgWCsvYrwh6SHh2lxx0XlkPbkUCK1Z0w65pYfCWzoTnI+Cz37bO6sZT53q/i1P NsC4hXKk6LTYpKkgYIUBExsBOFlWms0BtG/hmBzlT08g2UmMQi4Tq5B0MsmfcmRPzUJ1 /PiBCJ4ldyyYCj7jSHLM9mJzxD8WIEjC1whYJhyjSS9dqTh0JwsapAn/o9isee+qpy7q 6msf1qfdLJcYyl2X4/PxD7ztmCUSFU89kozKvMHhPCC0Moqvq0jdDgZP8pWPvfC6yLar fiP5OL5OTapXA4hmRrQHvonke6bg5Fxs812+Po0/BlhvXtprkKXCxByInA+XdAtWIzuE qu1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531OAudXddOD2w6k9DOy/xbdINjnR7FgE0lHeas2iNRdBQiJLoIl Az6Eerfzy7EoZkjGaeVxUep52D5djvzWi/t0wbo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7nxbFOVkYD35xjWuM6SIl8bvMxLC0yk5lvtajr1gD1Ntz3OFKr6sjGQNe+l23LEDD+ys6nblqUrimBuAoi/o= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:19ca:: with SMTP id nm10mr4121384pjb.175.1618412127795; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 07:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:55:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83wntjeus0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 03 Apr 2021 09:39:43 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204017 Archived-At: [Resending my reply as I accidentally sent it only to Eli.] Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Juri suggested #ffff88, and it seems good to me. Both readable and >> noticeable, yet not too bright. I don't see a very large difference between yellow and #ffff88, but I guess it's slightly better than what we have now. >> My original suggestions were "lemon chiffon" (seems ideally subdued to >> me, but it would be a drastic change), "khaki1" or "light goldenrod". FWIW, I think "lemon chiffon" is by far the best one. It also fits better with the rest of the default theme. This is followed by "khaki1" or "light goldenrod", in that order. I'm not against #ffff88 if that's what people want to see, but the change is not large enough to make much of a difference here. > If we change the face's colors, we should make sure the new colors > look well on both light and dark backgrounds. Yup. I think "khaki3" stands out sufficiently well and goes well together with "lemon chiffon", but there is obviously room for experimentation.