From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66554: [PATCH] Add the public API of Compat to the core Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:34:32 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87pm1ggrdx.fsf@posteo.net> <877ckgpa45.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <87mstbpyd7.fsf@posteo.net> <87h6jjah1g.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <87edenptba.fsf@posteo.net> <87bk9raaad.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <87a5pbvbxc.fsf@posteo.net> <875xzza8jw.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <87edemldlw.fsf@posteo.net> <83cyu6ifzw.fsf@gnu.org> <875xzyl8lq.fsf@posteo.net> <837ckeievw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6jiqtsp.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <835xzyiagj.fsf@gnu.org> <871qamkx0m.fsf@posteo.net> <83wmsdhgw8.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmsdxvz6.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <878r4ml8sg.fsf@posteo.net> <87bk9iz86a.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11269"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 66554@debbugs.gnu.org, Philip Kaludercic , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier To: Daniel Mendler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 19 00:35:22 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rQbus-0002ku-1u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:35:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQbuY-0005Oa-HD; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQbuW-0005OI-Ol for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:35:01 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQbuV-0003YZ-OG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:35:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQbuX-0001Ga-JJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:35:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 23:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66554 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 66554-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66554.17056208844838 (code B ref 66554); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 23:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66554) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2024 23:34:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56991 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQbuG-0001Fy-2V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:34:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::534]:54551) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQbuD-0001Fk-SF for 66554@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:34:42 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-55a44bb66d3so156658a12.1 for <66554@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:34:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705620874; x=1706225674; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UVgFxkqo7KJ+JgaSRxykAf9m6Sijatmfci6DJ5zuqwA=; b=Cq5H07GFCQRWaDciZxPE4kVUl7s66IVzSEeCB8XeK6PsdexOyvbxFYsHHiBWOnrM3w dNb5YPxjJatLObGAeaukAwXHoUzet0FOXX05vm+YUzHx57Y+38J4tv7S5+05Mj8aVz5k xgainqK9sWEmwARdEQlOfsIpI/SzN890MtrY67SMkcytO526rsESVoByG7BN5CNV378t uj3yc1oTcEYY/2Zwi9eiOL2bruiqviJ5ORaZocp1EMiGp4kjJK0StF1mJgrmbMbU9zEm NcMwaLLeMWbB5jbrV/vOeb0E16xIMM/v/GWPCwp1xsaVnnUKHmZLLSP8vnY2kgphM8oJ 7IvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705620874; x=1706225674; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UVgFxkqo7KJ+JgaSRxykAf9m6Sijatmfci6DJ5zuqwA=; b=ukCKKL3ScF4MqeVysvS4dDQRGSfpLYuUTjXMJ1B6ugMEh9aHMXsnaWNMz/K9wjX0W+ j7+lbEb2Z5DPYQSK5WNMjgGtjbm2hrauWkwO/ckZBOpmFyA+qCkjB0/v35/O8YXbBnsg TWUJr6q5w+2Xs28P3cBLZWdajF5cPu3FDqJ1CYmFactz8DeFn1mc0w0wLYqMD1fUPgQb YuQrRS6yLrcFIPW9Dx4t3fr4jWAe8a8Y4wbiO1sgQR1pA51/zgzybkvaIk6823G4aaZG bSupK7tqtTl2F2y7BwGIPSJwcns+Bk37ZhRJn53vtzOKUcaoLJagyLANMNhMkFMrdAUm UgkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwrhT7hA6NQ/Q01lMlI4uQzryEWk96GNugXqbHydV91VVjNnPYR 4vhFYQLEThU/nJuAwB8jxzNgrxYXnHgvxpLoDa+BR4o64y/0ZPrGC4Z7JCexY9++68fjLv9WeVu y4WqBqfBbxz06uN6y+bpsLYBNUfU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHA9FNaLI7qZCl6eCHsOQao12DEfwqWN9VoAG2MwoDB6blm8uex7MGAVGmzEHHw5iSAYTu1gkjHdW1skldz3Ms= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:50cf:b0:55a:4f03:b7fa with SMTP id h15-20020a05640250cf00b0055a4f03b7famr320684edb.52.1705620873535; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:34:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:34:32 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87bk9iz86a.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278460 Archived-At: Daniel Mendler writes: >> If you want to label the `most-positive-fixnum` as a hack, I guess >> that's OK but then the comment should clarify what it's referring to. > > I may be wrong, but I assume that Philip considers the autoload a hack. > In this thread we discussed various alternatives to approach this > problem, e.g., the package version regexp (another hack), or my naive > idea of simply writing 29.1.9999 in the compat.el package header (yet > another hack). IMHO, the "naive" (why naive?) number 9999 is more readable, and in practice will be the same as using most-positive-fixnum. So I'd just use that.