From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16797: 24.3.50; `emacs-lisp-mode' does not derive from `lisp-mode' Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:11:57 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17546"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 16797@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 13 00:13:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k5yzf-0004Rw-Ol for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:13:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49816 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5yze-0004VO-Bj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5yzW-0004Tl-K3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5yzW-0002Ny-B8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5yzW-0004dY-75 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 22:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16797 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 16797-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16797.159727032617730 (code B ref 16797); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 22:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16797) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2020 22:12:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45775 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5yyc-0004bu-Jf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-f180.google.com ([209.85.219.180]:43309) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5yyY-0004ai-Tu for 16797@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-f180.google.com with SMTP id m200so2187410ybf.10 for <16797@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:12:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fdaVs4zgqbQTtvJ2BNQOXYLPCZKr4SMgJudJVKK8iLQ=; b=VDEamLi7yoqTZb488XECa8SAgxuJ7zxFJfTnI7/sJQL3GXOkwLewymFVZcjQUXhnaC sQoVFr7vUF7Khg66WWMzU1NRGmNuVDOBdtZ8QcHqkE9sQUMcIUpxH5kkXyc/bPhmbDGi YUa7iX1SVHWjhRnXE+tssmY3xSBl+LAWyU7SLGc485MkffZnzx/hxAP1tGDhL1BTVMFh /XgsqHAClyPyE7WR2iLVCChQPpqbfyELj3eG5icrvg2kkF1DJ5aiWIsexoa1pPHiQwMw 5+2HC4pfVX/wf5V0PbM6JweZgd8Dl8h2CcMWDjz+2i1GZ0fMQGt3bvuH++MEfIULP6Vr Sd/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532iTMnBcoiym0n1VdiIVHSp30MS1INx3OKHN+vNNEbTqoM15lKQ /z907VbqfoEJ85R5+qsH9lDll5qA4raFvAVfr5lcaJ/Q0j0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwq5+ey/1kbO7aYOAQlzrjrcopBOx64E7spjgmatRsfE+tdesPM797011jzSMIO72vbU0Gpuy30FYNRIbW1ivk= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4609:: with SMTP id t9mr2219440yba.231.1597270317581; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:11:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:25:09 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184887 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> This is as much a question as a bug report, but this seems a better >> place to ask it than emacs-devel@gnu.org: >> Why is `emacs-lisp-mode' derived from `prog-mode' and not `lisp-mode'? > > Hysterical raisins? > > We could/should probably restructure it a bit, with a common ancestor > `lisp-mode' and then have scheme-mode, emacs-lisp-mode, and > common-lisp-mode derive from it. > > Patch welcome (after the unfreeze), Is this still relevant now that emacs-lisp-mode inherits lisp-data-mode (which inherits prog-mode)? Best regards, Stefan Kangas