unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Cc: Phil Sainty <psainty@orcon.net.nz>, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>,
	Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
	51051@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#51051: Restore longlines.el to non-obsolete status
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 19:16:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADwFkmkhEOm3GmEPMsmnycjZq=121xoGj3UGmDyMga65QNLhAg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pmsiecfu.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 06 Oct 2021 11:21:09 +0200")

unarchive 18589
reopen 18589
forcemerge 18589 51051
tags 18589 - notabug
thanks

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Phil Sainty <psainty@orcon.net.nz> writes:
>
>> As longlines.el is still valuable for reasons unrelated to
>> visual-line-mode, I'd like it to be restored to non-obsolete
>> status.
>
> I think that makes sense.  Does anybody else object?

There was a previous discussion in Bug#18589 (now merged):

    https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18589

It seems like Stefan Monnier's take was this:

> Recently someone pointed out that using longlines-mode in a buffer that
> contain *very* long lines makes it possible to view&edit the buffer
> without suffering unbearable performance problems.  So maybe in this
> sense it's not completely obsolete.

And:

> I wouldn't mind de-obsoleting it.

The last message in Bug#18589 links here:

    https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-12/msg00475.html

(I'm copying in Stefan and Glenn, in case they have something to add.)





  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-06 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-06  1:36 bug#51051: Restore longlines.el to non-obsolete status Phil Sainty
2021-10-06  9:21 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-10-06 23:16   ` Stefan Kangas [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-30  9:57 bug#18589: Why is the the longlines package obsolete? bruce.connor.am
2014-09-30 18:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-07-02 15:33   ` bug#51051: Restore longlines.el to non-obsolete status Lars Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADwFkmkhEOm3GmEPMsmnycjZq=121xoGj3UGmDyMga65QNLhAg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=stefan@marxist.se \
    --cc=51051@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=psainty@orcon.net.nz \
    --cc=rgm@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).