Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm not against the table, I'm saying that for the manuals that come > with Emacs we don't need any entries in the table. IOW, the table > could be provided, but only for extensions by users, if they want to > extend this to manuals which don't come as part of the Emacs > distribution. I think we should include a list of built-in manuals, so that we only send users to known-good places, and tell them otherwise. The drawback is that we need to remember to update the list when we add a new manual. Perhaps something like the attached.