Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > Yes. Except that now I'm asking whether we need to obsolete the >> > variable. is that just because of the name? >> >> I guess we could re-use the old name if we really want to. But it would >> still be a breaking change, since this is now a list instead of a single >> value. > > That's also easy to handle in a compatible way, right? OK, here's what I propose. I still suggest to make the old name into an obsolete alias in order to mark it as internal, please let me know if this is acceptable.