From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50658: Error messages including function names violates coding conventions Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 05:11:23 -0700 Message-ID: References: <83y27u5efd.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7ei53pr.fsf@gnu.org> <834ka5kzwz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27680"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50658@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 28 14:17:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mVC3W-0006tL-7S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 14:17:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60980 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVC3U-0007um-QM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:17:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVBxr-00006x-66 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVBxq-0000r1-Uf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mVBxp-0004ra-VI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50658-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50658.163283109118657 (code B ref 50658); Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50658) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2021 12:11:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mVBxL-0004qr-Ec for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:11:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]:41531) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mVBxJ-0004qe-Ks for 50658@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:11:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f43.google.com with SMTP id mi2-20020a17090b4b4200b0019f1349df1dso1485424pjb.0 for <50658@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 05:11:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TAu92RDTL4+q0lt6AJJvgHir4baOtFJAmBtVVmNq29U=; b=7AFA8SO23HYPfaebHADFhWz0i8QYhZOCPLYIILBG+z0iAl+x5Xjgkp+bZP/rdtL9xr qnL8TUo4bQBklWq5FvPvhZSadZgUyJixxTHv8EPoHSIXrTxiKg7q/pidBVdy03vG+sgb /4AydMI2e000dR0D7mGHF9snMtJDb8KsVL0lN3qP5SEMr8KGvPbDdvVStPs1wnXVXnmW XTOPXTsU+OOjHJgVbnY9uvc9tNtL7bD1q2Sc8FvyLZZbe20EmwgyBLqZyu+5WHtDzbLc sTeHM5W/IRVHXPQS3ox0eySttI72e7rWpkxmxDNO2OLqpL2QtYih2NEAxa4Xlg8HJLlR EDDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532OYhxyG9G6SohwFjeZw27XwMrhUPQeG1OfghC0fdTESSedvDC2 k9psNSjr6isvKq0DHYRUgPIDX6c1Kad8lr+HGEI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmZjt1CYAL7TtBtWsxS9o3EKd/THi3Dpk8Xik3AWHpChmFiF6BYpXCn3R/1+QOX1GPLEbVEkWux5C4oNVjpF4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c1c5:b0:13e:2e1e:aaa4 with SMTP id c5-20020a170902c1c500b0013e2e1eaaa4mr4766160plc.32.1632831083630; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 05:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 05:11:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <834ka5kzwz.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215767 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> +Invalid input''. This convention is better avoided in most cases. > > That last sentence is unexpected, and seems to contradict everything > you wrote before it. Which convention should be avoided, and why? To be honest, I was a bit unsure about this sentence. I guess I'm trying to say "don't overdo it" or "don't do it by default just because you can". But perhaps this is already clear from the rest of the text?