From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:08:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87v9tsv65b.fsf@gnus.org> <87ef0grneg.fsf@gnus.org> <83r24fwjwm.fsf@gnu.org> <83a7b3w34h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="38221"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 37420@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 17 14:10:25 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iACJN-0009mM-BO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:10:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45192 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iACJL-0004Vg-Fm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:10:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iACJ1-0004R7-4R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iACIz-0007s9-Tu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iACIz-0007s1-QV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:10:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iACIz-0005Md-JA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37420 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 37420-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37420.156872215220552 (code B ref 37420); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37420) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2019 12:09:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51754 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iACIC-0005LQ-47 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f179.google.com ([209.85.210.179]:40229) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iACI9-0005L9-6r for 37420@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f179.google.com with SMTP id x127so2046480pfb.7 for <37420@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:09:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Qn7HxQ9VxYIuvItncW8TYfeme400rHSr3uX0/BJb1K0=; b=sAB6God7+yofu+xfprorQ1htpUlwBPlS/swLQ2+zwjQ58QgL5K9UKHF6dDTCShLOG3 +uPQac3P7BEKtoU7AZQ5+C2h99sqi6UVHrAG73IS2iULczDMU3W21woXW4WQw73T6cqn qlwov5vdcWMqvuyMuIlLaDFHARDLwHbMV5X1S0OH2ko+drVP+Y0YP2vh9xClGGkD2i57 zgwLyxA03iE22QC2HB9Wj96891CqF6LF89jVZTEp7CnTadN5FIndMq5/HAOxu+TH7+IE 5cGnj/1pqVLHITFaZ8QJI/BmF+DpUuI1sZXXb1kE7R5CCfbO3BvB7I2SJhx9X8eFfj/B EI1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXgdaGsEHm7ysgF9mjnfCfG3zpmJ/UBS8pOiNsqTX6NmSFZ1gkX 5nkZBgX+vcPOZET45/CsFHz3c+Ib5tfCSZWNHy8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzTrVsn3Ma28TFooV3JEuiBTKQ2luoS9hks6Lqmya2HVW7PZYruESnwQb92uRRD3Bgm1fwNI0EPhPzB0GFB5ZI= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8009:: with SMTP id j9mr2266976pfi.107.1568722143372; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:09:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83a7b3w34h.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166629 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Should we perhaps do something to help those who know this under the > > > name "SHA1"? > > > > Is there any risk that some users believe that these would be two > > different algorithms? My guess would be no, but I might be wrong. > > I have no idea, but I personally didn't even know SHA1 has another > name, let alone a more "official" one. This is the spelling in RFC 3174: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3174 Perhaps SHA1 is just a common typo? Best regards, Stefan Kangas