From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67687: Feature request: automatic tags management Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 16:40:10 -0800 Message-ID: References: <2f86b882-9ec1-f63f-d90b-5f8f7ae114f2@gutov.dev> <58D84A29-9A63-45BA-AD8B-B476CDC931A1@gmail.com> <812729c8-726f-d60e-2603-2d8e588929fd@gutov.dev> <835y0sgg12.fsf@gnu.org> <661f4951-cb0a-5257-63b0-efe71a0d217e@gutov.dev> <83y1de7jyr.fsf@gnu.org> <1a8c51fb-a114-42a4-ae40-8314d3f21104@gutov.dev> <83tto0400p.fsf@gnu.org> <6a684420-2098-4c9f-a17c-61150e9f3321@gutov.dev> <2c7ce860-17cf-4955-8150-5474e36faca0@gutov.dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34999"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 67687@debbugs.gnu.org, eskinjp@gmail.com To: Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 02 01:41:20 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rKSqO-0008vt-Ca for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 01:41:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rKSq6-0000a2-HD; Mon, 01 Jan 2024 19:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rKSq4-0000ZT-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2024 19:41:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rKSq4-0005pE-3e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2024 19:41:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rKSq5-0001Xc-Vl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2024 19:41:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67687 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 67687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67687.17041560215867 (code B ref 67687); Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2024 00:40:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48980 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rKSpQ-0001WY-Mb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2024 19:40:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::535]:42138) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rKSpO-0001WL-J0 for 67687@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2024 19:40:19 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5534dcfdd61so15309714a12.0 for <67687@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Jan 2024 16:40:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704156010; x=1704760810; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KFmeyARJzbXV6Fuq4W14Ay/6XH5aQseyJBaq//BRWCU=; b=ZpkFDFmM+8SJ49Y/uof2geP4PPOmc54N6R3d5zEkjsp8sTb4t8c7wam+2ztPOoXXI+ pNuXoXiP81UYxaiTv3aJyPqXbjDzDhMN/2x7FlQfW3+ai4Y0pCQsvluJXKEy++p9693U 2LikC8a1dIFxlJXBz+o2pIeu2aw7vUE84agsZIpg1lLSLlHuJ90kcLG9Ym4asSpEBNbA +Jzp9fw9PO8AHOtziRW4LqK+GPbMorTPidHZS64KN2arNT6c1/42whAK3a/z9HmUaEZo WpQVmGosjEl7QrdiiVEwp+2X1j7yXLyM+C8+y/I0SR48Ip/yU5Lksql9yCm2Ru4gag1z aUWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704156010; x=1704760810; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KFmeyARJzbXV6Fuq4W14Ay/6XH5aQseyJBaq//BRWCU=; b=F3fRdB27et6Q3gwTezmqgZsb92XXZ9X23xhfN2p9VYMkdpFAE7MvXaFd9XdtMFbM56 qXyDmDCypNRm9tnlTGVcTHptszIFoUDOQ4fGWN0MutTRb5o9o9COhhoDbnHNUxP8h7UD Pw8ecjqKritjT5pI6/yhCH3SzbSoN4m9fyVnxA5KJbyDH+AHE8wI3PQ4FMMTbVF8HlRC oXj4/qRevfUG4E6Di3URnE4tLoUmnVpgocVU159ahoJeIxFHXqStsdA9zbHZBgtUAFDO JYZ1T9XOOYxslgPsUZNqph0hUn49svDtdxTZXjJrOPTS1UNCthuRX6gOG4XPiLKAmt7J hu9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwOGUX44lOA5oEUE9IB1u3G24u8ALDRPQOdzBNbL3d6gfzlQ94N Syj4cYva5W159uXd+2k+KTbhF5KjNstKqeuBnyg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE+CFeLhfJiEyglcGbh6poZrgAs4mS0YRgjnYPPl88LUQICGWp4u0Sz6j/aFCzrHkm+LxEFSKMpa9lmI5jYt20= X-Received: by 2002:a50:a453:0:b0:553:8396:ef48 with SMTP id v19-20020a50a453000000b005538396ef48mr16067794edb.23.1704156010470; Mon, 01 Jan 2024 16:40:10 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 1 Jan 2024 16:40:10 -0800 In-Reply-To: <2c7ce860-17cf-4955-8150-5474e36faca0@gutov.dev> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277202 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: >> Should this be marked unsafe? Actually, same question for all of the >> above defcustoms, given that we use `shell-command-to-string'. > > Given that this option doesn't have the 'safe-local-variable' property, > do we need to do something else? I was thinking of setting :risky t >>> +;; We have to list all extensions: etags falls back to Fortran >>> +;; when it cannot determine the type of the file. >> >> (A battle-tested default, if nothing else. ;-) > > I'd rather etags skipped unknown files, but there is no such option. Yeah, that might make more sense.