From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26028: 26.0.50; epatch for multifile patches Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:34:55 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87varjfzhr.fsf@yandex.ru> <838tofh93b.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3wfv3iy.fsf@yandex.ru> <871srfbyps.fsf@calancha-pc> <87efvfkx9l.fsf@drachen> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16053"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 26028@debbugs.gnu.org, Arseny Sher , Kaushal Modi To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 11 09:36:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k5OpM-00045K-VS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:36:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60996 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5OpL-0007Yo-L5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 03:36:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5OpG-0007Yd-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 03:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5OpF-0003Yn-N5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 03:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5OpF-0002Ag-Kf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 03:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26028 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 26028-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26028.15971313038271 (code B ref 26028); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26028) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Aug 2020 07:35:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38426 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5OoJ-00029K-6s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 03:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-f195.google.com ([209.85.219.195]:46443) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5OoH-00028m-G9 for 26028@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 03:35:01 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-f195.google.com with SMTP id x10so6534736ybj.13 for <26028@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:35:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=awt2Ln7fNjvfqIrFPAseVg5iFrBhO9yyIRGPweRDq1Q=; b=SUYO5JE5lH7rQ2k6ASmjrldoV2VHy8Zr/sNkbl5cS0lwY0G128ywM9rzkApLMEUByl LlEWBClnfxOS9QNhcw1dQfM17SW51r+JvFN3KDz7cw8kziqPTsMoIgEMvNpT09BYi+cj zivmzfCi1VQ3WmWVhz5yIqRiSVCi2U2YbFxytyfnT+dhBqxuX4gavxDMat3H27zqjv69 LeogGWGR6Pinek6mN6yXzpn1ivDwY1W4atn3tLYic4UmJi89KFG9IeoEsj4aM3DQyGi1 EaHKLgu/bB3RCmHwL3BT9k+QCtUEq/BL06vDFR5AEhPCv7Pe3WUQyjoN8PPshFqQ8Nz2 lwDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532CYWzNaQCdo+qdUeeYQ0uWQQjdV+OLgXN0lr79ZRSkVQJR1gkG f6ZF4fk9sPlhKvztNPcWssKwLEgdG/gCdXddJSQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIqA9ja6Z4O5eq+fN2BzMgy5PoSbhJc43eVjAUa8liCDTUDKt+IbGLZD5IjxiydI2MfRcdysRPRbgMFow7b6Q= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:508:: with SMTP id o8mr22129544ybp.43.1597131295978; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:34:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Tino Calancha's message of "Wed, 24 May 2017 09:46:59 +0900 (JST)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184621 Archived-At: Tino Calancha writes: > On Wed, 24 May 2017, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > >> Tino Calancha writes: >> >>> Recently i am not using `epatch', but maybe following patch >>> is of interest for someone: >> >> FWIW, do you think you understood all of the code you changed (I ask >> because I gave up after a while)? > I think so. I you exclude from the patch the added tests in > test/lisp/vc/ediff-ptch-tests.el > then this patch just touch: > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > The only it does: > * tweak the original heuristic part for guessing the file names > * change the suggested defaults in the prompts asking for the patch and > dirs to patch. > >> If you did, do you think we should >> install your fix, or are there open questions? > I have tested with plain diffs and with Git diffs. I didn't test it > with other VC than Git. > I don't think solves all the problems, but at least it makes `epatch' usable for > the most common multipatch situations. That was 3 years ago. It looks like this patch was never installed. Should it be? Best regards, Stefan Kangas