From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58119: 29.0.50; Is gnus-coding.texi worth keeping around? Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:16:31 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15928"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: 58119@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 27 19:20:24 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1odEFr-00041G-Pt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:20:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37076 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odEFq-00023a-PO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:20:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odECc-000738-Q8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:17:16 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odECc-0007Yf-EJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odECc-0005H5-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 58119 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.166429901820260 (code B ref -1); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2022 17:16:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56677 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odECY-0005Gi-9N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:16:58 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55350) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odECT-0005GW-5s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:16:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odECA-0006oI-Si for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oo1-xc35.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c35]:38497) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odEC9-0007Vu-EU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:16:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oo1-xc35.google.com with SMTP id z9-20020a4a4909000000b0047651b95fbdso1656880ooa.5 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:16:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject :date; bh=RJUxGKx9aDlgvYMM2pThvbZJEt/6l1DAWLIdTSv1EJ8=; b=GEZ9xcm9gAJ/m194qGUoIWZrXm0BbW124ry28KCIffCl0XbvDhOdnVEYTJHAHWD7vb P/xQekX5eabQac/M6PQd9HIcgwkxv4oXrB8fSqrfRZQ5nZYgGJ2zQrKmn7NLqwrPjNf+ oiHDmxtbypQJ40XOX2FK1RFjAsMYN2gTSMfxoc7yBtukXHZfx8VESyiKboBzEhbIvsPP EdVQ75CAuLNL76KjhvgScVNUC2kxnwMxxsekhbtCgbbNUAjslrzy6kdbJ0UGdLg80KW+ IbuOBR6X3IDRVpxLucCnMqr0+1tE6dje8To2rV3ED8/Luw5454yejtmZK22On5fC9Zq2 xdwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=RJUxGKx9aDlgvYMM2pThvbZJEt/6l1DAWLIdTSv1EJ8=; b=YFSSrQRVjfyn4xkz839f+X8YjrcRAvL+AgEG7c9dyUYSkz1F5jQTqhS1STmgVzWusE 6mfGjT0zbf/lEuyeKfcLjtbTlf2Z4ecjHq1e1AfZS9OHRtZSDfWN020pnn00ZjNxVbhe IjS6zQS7Wy4YaPkDPJ1CNGd6H2z7PA24IcLPA92z8pTXVtyXy3KynF0YL3uhJV1h6Y0i 9DxwLsMeYoXISO5DsWMBCvL+SPsIs76pGb/u+Gyg3qVDIAJcLdEt1Zt8e5wCL/ytzsh0 5d/PKsfKo8PCeblJwdvp7l28LEBtol0DHVmI9sezoykD9bH22XBuAQ4Z7tDDum+t3yBM F0dw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf25wcUPkAwCc9tD8cV5QY7ff7lKbQCGmZhGM9kK4lvxAXC7FuYy C8JI6mzGjEtPUoX7+FV7+F+Slh2NagHF32t36BNgkYuJ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4o0ovwQQELBmdyhiA4r570Uy0/ZI3M9YaHnuPbcfDsf2VQk8OwlLuk73TWjHctLRtYpjtrbGLxAr0Jm63VgCs= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:a70a:0:b0:475:601f:1e14 with SMTP id g10-20020a4aa70a000000b00475601f1e14mr11086387oom.5.1664298991978; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:16:31 -0400 X-Hashcash: 1:20:220927:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org::OeVWUIWDHUJ/HUWw:0a1w Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::c35; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-oo1-xc35.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243751 Archived-At: Severity: wishlist Is gnus-coding.texi worth keeping around? Perhaps the bits and pieces of useful information there should be moved elsewhere, where it is more discoverable, and the file removed.